[2025] NZEmpC 205 Open Country Dairy Limited v Stewart (Judgment of Judge M S King, 12 September 2025) FREEZING ORDER - VARIATION – APPLICATION TO DISCHARGE FREEZING ORDERS – evidence of fraud by respondent – real risk of dissipation of assets remains – respondent not to be prohibited from dealing with the assets for the purposes of ordinary living expenses – application to discharge freezing order declined – interests of justice favour variation- freezing order varied.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3881 items matching your search terms
-
[2025] NZEmpC 205 Open Country Dairy Limited v Stewart [PDF, 172 KB] -
[2025] NZEmpC 204 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand [PDF, 134 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 204 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand (Judgment of Judge JC Holden 12 September 2025) CONSENT – stay of execution of Authority orders
-
[2025] NZEmpC 203 Lanigan & Ors v Fonterra Brands (New Zealand) Ltd [PDF, 212 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 203 Lanigan & Ors v Fonterra Brands (New Zealand) Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 5) of Chief Judge Inglis, 11 September 2025) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AS INTERVENER - The Law Association will assist the Court with its presence - no countervailing considerations - application granted
-
[2025] NZEmpC 198 Rural Practice Ltd and Abdul Jabbar v A Labour Inspector [PDF, 234 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 198 Rural Practice Ltd and Abdul Jabbar v A Labour Inspector (Judgment of Judge Holden, 10 September 2025) NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGE – challenge to penalties determination – issues about recusal of Authority member are procedural – barred by s 179(5) Employment Relations Act – concern to be dealt with by way of a de novo challenge to substantive determination – quantum ordered appropriate – setting penalties is an inexact science – breaches sufficiently serious to warrant 85 per cent starting point – breaches were multiple, systematic, intentional and involved deception – insufficient evidence of financial incapacity – support and kindness to employees is not a mitigating factor – late and partial performance deserves little credit – penalties not out of proportion – quantum sits in the middle by relative comparison to other cases – challenge dismissed
-
[2025] NZEmpC 201 Pilgrim Ors v Attorney-General Ors [PDF, 202 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 201 Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors (Costs Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge Inglis, 10 September 2025) APPLICATION FOR DISBURSEMENTS – questionable whether High Court Rules apply in determining disbursements – expenses may be broader than disbursements – application determined under conventional High Court Rules principles - investigator’s work partially overlapped with work ordinarily done by a lawyer – non-legal support provided by investigator to witnesses was reasonably necessary for the conduct of the proceeding – investigator expenses partially awarded – accountant did not give evidence in Court but provided useful material for other expert accountant – accountant invoice awarded – counsel accommodation could only cover hearing days and bookends
-
[2025] NZEmpC 202 A Labour Inspector v Dao [PDF, 182 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 202 A Labour Inspector v Dao (Judgment (No 8) of Judge Beck, 10 September 2025) FREEZING ORDER – VARIATION – EXTENSION - application to vary and extend freezing orders – extension of freezing order granted by consent – date set down for review
-
[2025] NZEmpC 200 (Judgment (No 9) of Judge M S King 9 September 2025 [PDF, 109 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 200 (Judgment (No 9) of Judge M S King 9 September 2025) FREEZING ORDER –freezing order discharged by consent. NON-PUBLICATION – interim non-publication orders set aside
-
[2025] NZEmpC 197 Open Country Dairy Limited v Stewart [PDF, 163 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 197 Open Country Dairy Limited v Stewart (Judgment of Judge M S King, 2 September 2025) FREEZING ORDER – VARIATION - CONSENT - freezing order varied by consent
-
[2025] NZEmpC 196 Labour Inspector v SSM Investments Ltd [PDF, 140 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 196 Labour Inspector v SSM Investments Ltd (Oral Judgment (No3) of Judge KG Smith, 2 September 2025) of FREEZING AND ANCILLARY ORDERS – NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – orders extended
-
[2025] NZEmpC 195 The Secretary for Education v NZ Post Primary Teachers' Association Incorporated Te Wehengarua [PDF, 175 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 195 The Secretary for Education v NZ Post Primary Teachers' Association Incorporated Te Wehengarua (Judgment of Judge JC Holden, 2 September 2025) CHALLENGE TO OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE – objection to relevance – documents sought may provide background and context to assist interpretative exercise – challenge successful
-
[2025] NZEmpC 194 Eastpac Corp Ltd v Zheng [PDF, 129 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 194 Eastpac Corp Ltd v Zheng (Consent judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 1 September 2025)
-
[2025] NZEmpC 193 Black Lion Holdings Ltd v Peterson [PDF, 178 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 193 Black Lion Holdings Ltd v Peterson (judgment of Judge JC Holden, 29 August 2025) APPLICATION FOR STAY – SECURITY FOR COSTS – evidence of plaintiff’s inability to pay if unsuccessful – application for stay not required to protect challenge – defendant entitled to fruits of success – application for stay of proceedings declined - security for costs ordered – challenge to determination stayed until security for costs is paid.
-
[2025] NZEmpC 192 Cunningham v healthAlliance NZ Limited [PDF, 150 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 192 Cunningham v healthAlliance NZ Limited (Costs Judgment of Judge M S King, 29 August 2025) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – self-represented litigant – costs awarded
-
[2025] NZEmpC 191 Cunningham v healthAlliance NZ Limited [PDF, 209 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 191 Cunningham v healthAlliance NZ Limited (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge M S King, 29 August 2025) APPLICATION FOR WITNESS TO APPEAR VIA AVL – application opposed – factual issues uncontentious – evidence brief and unlikely to give rise to credibility issues – court has the ability to determine credibility and reliability - consent of parties not determinative – application to appear via AVL granted – APPLICATION FOR SEVERANCE OF PROCEEDINGS – right to natural justice unaffected by severance – partial hearing would be artificial and inefficient use of resources – application for severance appears motivated by avoiding compliance – application denied.
-
[2025] NZEmpC 190 Wilson Parking NZ Ltd v Turner [PDF, 214 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 190 Wilson Parking NZ Ltd v Turner (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Helen Doyle, 28 August 2025) APPLICATION FOR CROSS-EXAMINATION - evidence can be tested at substantive hearing - no exceptional circumstances to allow cross-examination at interlocutory stage - application declined.
-
[2025] NZEmpC 189 Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc v Health New Zealand [PDF, 240 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 189 Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc v Health New Zealand (judgment of Judge Holden 28 August 2025) APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM INJUNCTION – union claims pay deduction notice/s for partial strike were unlawful – section 95B Employment Relations Act – arguable case of non-compliance – balance of convenience finely balanced but favours union– wage deductions for workers in the interim more impactful than recovery difficulties for employer – total sum relatively modest for enterprise of employer’s size – overall justice does not displace balance of convenience – application granted
-
[2025] NZEmpC 187 Santamaria v Television New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 206 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 187 Santamaria v Television New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge KG Smith, 27 August 2025) APPLICATION TO CONSOLIDATE PROCEEDINGS – Authority addressed preliminary jurisdiction question – issues not sufficiently discrete from substantive proceeding – same parties and same factual matrix – meaning of record of settlement essential to both claims – risk of issue estoppel – separation unlikely to shorten proceedings
-
[2025] NZEmpC 188 O'Brien v The Platform Media NZ Ltd [PDF, 196 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 188 O'Brien v The Platform Media NZ Ltd (Interlocutory judgment of Judge Helen Doyle 26 August 2025) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE - delay was inadvertent - interests of justice favour granting application - application granted - COSTS - not appropriate to categorise matter as granting an indulgence - costs awarded on category 2 band A basis
-
[2025] NZEmpC 186 Menzies v Corrigan [PDF, 309 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 186 Menzies v Corrigan (Costs judgment (No 2) of Judge Beck, 22 August 2025) APPLICATION FOR COSTS AGAINST NON-PARTY REPRESENTATIVE– APPLICATION FOR JOINDER –application to join plaintiff’s representative as party to proceedings for the purposes of costs – application for non-party discovery against defendant’s former lawyer was an extraordinary feature of the litigation – compensation for costs for non-party discovery conventional – advocates conduct directly contributed to costs incurred – costs awarded - CONDUCT OF REPRESENTATIVES – the conduct of representatives not beyond scrutiny of the Court– representatives may be personally liable for costs.
-
[2025] NZEmpC185 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 201 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 185 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (NZ) Ltd (Interlocutory (No 4) Judgment of Judge KG Smith 22 August 2025) FURTHER AND BETTER DISCLOSURE – parties disagreed about scope of notice – narrow interpretation not preferred – scope is clear on purposive reading and accounting for description of documents provided – relevance is clear – application grante
-
[2025] NZEmpC 184 Labour Inspector v SSM Investments Ltd [PDF, 143 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 184 Labour Inspector v SSM Investments Ltd (Oral judgment of Judge KG Smith 20 August 2025) SUBSTITUTED SERVICE – application granted – freezing and ancillary orders continued in light of difficulties with service
-
[2025] NZEmpC 182 Open Country Dairy Limited v Stewart [PDF, 203 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 182 Open Country Dairy Limited v Stewart (Judgment of Judge M S King, 19 August 2025) FREEZING ORDERS – freezing orders applied for on urgent and without notice basis - arguable case for applicant - risk of dissipation of assets due to conduct of respondent and Authority determination – balance of convenience and interests of justice favours applicant – application granted with condition. APPLICATION FOR NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS – interim non-publication orders made by consent in the Authority - disclosure would have adverse consequences on applicant and respondent – application granted.
-
2025] NZEmpC 183 Legal Hub Ltd v Singh [PDF, 207 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 183 Legal Hub Ltd v Singh (Judgment of Judge Smith, 19 August 2025) APPLICATION FOR DISCLOSURE BEFORE PROCEEDINGS COMMENCE – disclosure of bank statements sought – not required to provide adequate description of employment relationship problem – statement of problem in Authority requires less precision than High Court pleadings – applicant is rather searching for evidence to support their claim – Authority has sufficient investigative powers and can call for evidence as appropriate
-
[2025] NZEmpC 181 Mutonhori v Wairoa District Council [PDF, 141 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 181 Mutonhori v Mairoa District Council (interlocutory judgment no 2 judgment of Judge Holden 19 August 2025) APPLICATION FOR STAY –small delay in costs application – partial security provided– timetable amended – application granted.
-
[2025] NZEmpC 180 AEL v BAQ [PDF, 212 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 180 AEL v BAQ [2025 (Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 18 August 2025) FREEZING AND ANCILLARY ORDERS – risk of dissipation not made out – extent of dishonest conduct uncertain – cash assets more difficult to monitor dissipation of – nevertheless assumptions about risk require adequate support – respondent made aware of concern some time ago – dissipation may have already occurred – application unsuccessful