From 3 June 2025 the Employment Court will start publishing its judgments from 24 hours after the delivery date, or the next business day, unless otherwise directed by a judge. Decisions of public interest may be published earlier, as directed by a judge.

You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

236 items matching your search terms

  1. [2020] NZEmpC 125 Smith v Fletcher Concrete & Infrastructure Ltd [PDF, 215 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 125 Smith v Fletcher Concrete & Infrastructure Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 18 August 2020) INTERIM REINSTATEMENT – challenge to Authority’s preliminary decision to decline interim reinstatement – employee was dismissed for breaching safety standards –employee made an arguable case for interim reinstatement – financial harm from lack of employment alleviated by mortgage holiday – employer concerned about further safety breaches – other employees would resign if employee is reinstated – balance of convenience points against interim reinstatement.

  2. [2020] NZEmpC 116 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd [PDF, 190 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 116 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge C Inglis, 4 August 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – Labour Inspector has applied for consequential orders – stay is sought until after application for rehearing - insufficient evidence of precarious financial position – merits of application for rehearing are weak – balance of convenience weighs against granting stay.

  3. [2020] NZEmpC 114 Ikundabose v McWatt Group Ltd [PDF, 242 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 114 Ikundabose v McWatt Group Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 31 July 2020) APPLICATION FOR REHEARING – application was made after limitation period – insufficient explanation for the delay – application declined - APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – not considered because application for rehearing was declined – COSTS – Authority’s costs award confirmed – employee made Court proceedings prolonged and difficult – early offer of settlement was rejected – large costs award would cause hardship – costs guideline scale applied without adjustment – costs also awarded for unsuccessful application for rehearing.