From 3 June 2025 the Employment Court will start publishing its judgments from 24 hours after the delivery date, or the next business day, unless otherwise directed by a judge. Decisions of public interest may be published earlier, as directed by a judge.

You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

236 items matching your search terms

  1. [2020] NZEmpC 60 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [PDF, 298 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 60 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 May 2020) APPLICATION FOR DECLARATION OF WITHDRAWAL – client will not respond to counsel communications – client unable to be reached – application for substituted service – counsel did not attempt all options to reach client – application for joinder of third parties for costs – whether counsel should be liable for costs – failure to record client’s address was imprudent but not a very serious breach of rules of procedure – joinder not warranted.

  2. [2020] NZEmpC 61 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd [PDF, 465 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 61 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 7 May 2020) NATURE OF EMPLOYMENT – SECTION 6 – real nature of the relationship between a courier driver and a courier company – worker spoke English as a second language – high degree of control – industry practice relevant but not determinative – no ability for worker to grow his own business – worker owned a van but using company finances and specifications – factors point toward a relationship of employment.

  3. [2020] NZEmpC 58 Kennedy v Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children [PDF, 208 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 58 Kennedy v Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 5 May 2020) CHALLENGE TO AUTHORITY MINUTES – whether challenge is available under s 179 – minutes can still be determinations – whether the determinations are about the procedure the Authority is intending to follow – interim orders in this case do not have an irreversible and substantive effect – decision to order attendance is procedural – challenge not available.    

  4. [2020] NZEmpC 53 Adventure Playground Rotorua Ltd v Isaac [PDF, 199 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 53 Adventure Playground Rotorua Ltd v Isaac (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge J C Holden, 28 April 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – company not in financial position to pay Authority award – employee would be injuriously affected by a stay – application declined - APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – company would not be in a position to pay an award of costs if its challenge does not succeed – security for costs ordered.

  5. [2020] NZEmpC 51 O’Boyle v McCue [PDF, 298 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 51 O’Boyle v McCue (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 28 April 2020) DISCLOSURE – MEDICAL CONFIDENTIALITY – whether employee’s medical records should be disclosed – breach of medical confidentiality – evidence is not sufficiently relevant to determining the issues to outweigh the public interest in keeping medical records confidential – objection to disclosure upheld – APPLICATION TO AMEND STATEMENT OF CLAIM – amendment unnecessary – application dismissed.

  6. [2020] NZEmpC 49 Maritime Union of New Zealand Inc v ISO Ltd [PDF, 381 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 49 Maritime Union of New Zealand Inc v ISO Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 22 April 2020) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT A PLAINTIFF – whether Union has standing when there is no collective agreement – Union is not “affected” under s 137(4)(a) and therefore does not have standing – union struck out - APPLICATION TO JOIN A PLAINTIFF – whether other employee can be joined as plaintiff – contracts were materially the same – plaintiff joined under s 221.

  7. [2020] NZEmpC 46 JCE v The Department of Corrections [PDF, 321 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 46 JCE v The Department of Corrections (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 17 April 2020) REMEDIES – the Authority awarded $30,000 for hurt and humiliation for unjustified disadvantage – employee suffers PTSD and depression from assault during employment – Authority failed to consider breach of contract damages separately from compensation for personal grievance – compensation increased to $65,000 – the Authority awarded $26,061.54 for lost remuneration – Authority was correct to deduct ACC payments because the employer was an accredited employer.

  8. [2020] NZEmpC 39 Metropolitan Glass & Glazing Ltd v Labour Inspector [PDF, 283 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 39 Metropolitan Glass & Glazing Ltd v Labour Inspector (Judgment of the full Court, 14 April 2020) ANNUAL HOLIDAYS – INCENTIVE PAYMENTS – whether the company’s short term incentive scheme should be counted under gross earnings – scheme was described as discretionary and was argued to be separate to employment agreements – scheme was actually incorporated into the agreement and had contractual force –description of scheme as discretionary is not relevant – CLOSEDOWN PERIOD – employee’s entitlements when not entitled to annual leave during a closedown period – statute allows only one approach – company was not following that approach.