You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3640 items matching your search terms

  1. [2025] NZEmpC 82 A Labour Inspector of MBIE v Dao (Judgment (No 2) [PDF, 206 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 82 A Labour Inspector of MBIE v Dao (Judgment (No 2) of Judge Beck, 17 April 2025) FREEZING ORDERS – VARIATION – application to vary freezing orders – some business bank accounts unfrozen – conditions placed on the unfreezing of some business bank acounts – family trust account not unfrozen – mortgage repayments can be facilitated without removing trust account from freezing order – new bank account to be set up for the purposes of receiving and paying ordinary living expenses and legal expenses

  2. 2025] NZEmpC 81 Nand v Idea Services Limited [PDF, 189 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 81 Nand v Idea Services Limited (Judgment of Judge M S King, 16 April 2025) STRIKE-OUT – REHEARING – WITHDRAWN PROCEEDINGS – COSTS – application to strike out application to rehear withdrawn application to file challenge out of time – application to file challenge out of time previously withdrawn due to settlement agreement – no basis for rehearing application as no hearing ever happened on original application – application to file challenge out of time cannot be reinstated or refiled because to do so would be an abuse of process in light of the settlement agreement – increased scale costs awarded – no basis for disbursements for out of town counsel – other disbursements awarded on GST exclusive basis

  3. [2025] NZEmpC 80  AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [PDF, 162 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 80  AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Judgment (No 2) of Judge Beck, 15 April 2025) CLARIFICATION OF REMEDIES – LOSS OF BENEFIT – claim by employee that they were entitled to retirement leave – employee could have requested retirement leave – employee could have been required to retire on medical grounds – insufficient evidence to find that employee might reasonably have been expected to obtain retirement leave but for unjustified dismissal

  4. [2025] NZEmpC 76 Vegepod NZ Ltd v Lowe [PDF, 291 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 76 Vegepod NZ Ltd v Lowe (Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 14 April 2025)APPLICATION FOR INTERIM REINSTATEMENT - dismissal arguably unjustifiable procedurally and substantively - relationship difficulties can be managed - insufficient evidence of misconduct and it is strongly refuted - balance of convenience favours reinstatement - reinstatement is sought for unusual reasons, but they do not tell against the appropriateness of the order - application granted

  5. [2025] NZEmpC 74 Locke v Rishworth Aviation Asia Pacific Limited (Interlocutory judgment (No 2) [PDF, 161 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 74 Locke v Rishworth Aviation Asia Pacific Limited (Interlocutory judgment (No 2) of Judge Beck, 10 April 2025) APPEARANCE UNDER PROTEST – APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE APPEARANCE – JURISDICTION – FORUM NON CONVENIENS – plaintiff has applied to join foreign airline – foreign airline served in New Zealand – foreign airline appeared under protest to jurisdiction – application to set aside appearance under protest – Court has jurisdiction to hear application as foreign airline served in New Zealand – proper process to challenge forum is to apply for a stay or strike out – appearance under protest set aside

  6. [2025] NZEmpC 69  Bread of Life Christian Church in Auckland v Chen [PDF, 463 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 69  Bread of Life Christian Church in Auckland v Chen (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 4 April 2025) STATUS OF WORKER – MINISTER OF RELIGION – IDENTITY OF EMPLOYER – LOST REMUNERATION – REINSTATEMENT – minister of religion became senior pastor of church – trust board of church split and dismissed minister – Authority ordered reinstatement – trust board dismissed minister again for redundancy – dispute over control of trust board being resolved in High Court – starting point to consider parties’ mutual rights and obligations – religious organisations differ from each other – there is no presumption against minister of religion intending to be legally bound – the Court is reluctant to resolve doctrinal disputes – the spiritual nature of a role is not determinative but is relevant – parties intended to be legally bound – parties’ relationship transcended but did not exclude legal relationship – parties’ intended for relationship to be employment relationship – no relevant in…

  7. [2025] NZEmpC 66 Weidemann v Landcorp Farming Ltd t/a Pamu [PDF, 165 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 66 Weidemann v Landcorp Farming Ltd t/a Pamu (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck 3 April 2025) LEAVE – EXTENSION OF TIME – CHALLENGE – successful application for leave to file challenge out of time – brief delay – delay caused partially by applicant unsuccessfully seeking to obtain legal advice – applicant took steps to preserve position prior to deadline for filing challenge – minimal detriment to respondent – detriment to applicant if challenge cannot be pursued

  8. [2025] NZEmpC 65 Rural Practice Limited and Abdul-Jabbar v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment [PDF, 160 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 65 Rural Practice Limited and Abdul-Jabbar v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (Judgment of Judge Holden 3 April 2025) APPLICATION TO EXPAND SCOPE OF PROCEEDINGS – no basis to change the issue previously agreed on by the parties – LEAVE TO FILE FURTHER EVIDENCE – proposed evidence not relevant to the issue – applications declined

  9. [2025] NZEmpC 64 Sharma v Rodney Farm 'N' Machinery Ltd [PDF, 216 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 64 Sharma v Rodney Farm 'N' Machinery Ltd (Judgment of Judge Holden 1 April 2025) PENALTIES – unlawful wage deduction and failure to keep proper records – not of a nature or seriousness to justify penalties – KIWISAVER CONTRIBUTIONS – ordered – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISADVANTAGE – responsibility of employer to ensure appropriate safety gear is available – grievance made out and Authority award upheld – CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – raised within 90 days – no sufficiently serious repudiatory conduct – lacking causative link between conduct and resignation – grievance not made out.

  10. [2025] NZEmpC 61 Faitala and Vea v The Pacific Island Business Development Trust [PDF, 178 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 61 Faitala and Vea v The Pacific Island Business Development Trust (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M S King, 1 April 2025) SECURITY FOR COSTS – risk that second plaintiff will be unable to meet any possible adverse costs award – merits insufficiently certain to be relevant – an order of security will prevent second plaintiff from pursuing challenge – defendant will incur costs irrespective of whether second plaintiff is a party to proceedings – premature to assess whether costs will be dealt with on a joint and several basis – no order for security awarded

  11. [2025] NZEmpC 60 Courage & Ors-Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors [PDF, 201 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 60 Courage & Ors-Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 1 April 2025) APPLICATION FOR STAY - Court has exclusive jurisdiction for judicial review of Labour Inspector - position will not change on appeal - while judicial review may be unnecessary depending on result of appeal, the plaintiffs wish to proceed with judicial review - balance of convenience points against stay - application declined

  12. [2025] NZEmpC 59 healthAlliance NZ Limited v Cunningham [PDF, 157 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 59 healthAlliance NZ Limited v Cunningham (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M S King, 26 March 2025) URGENCY – APPLICATION FOR SANCTIONS – COMPLIANCE – application for urgency in respect of application for sanctions following breach of compliance order – Court does not have jurisdiction to issue all sanctions sought – both parties have failed to comply with orders of the Court – not necessary to order urgency