[2020] NZEmpC 235 Sinton v Coatesville Motors 2013 Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 18 December 2020) CONSENT.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3642 items matching your search terms
-
[2020] NZEmpC 235 Sinton v Coatesville Motors 2013 Ltd [PDF, 142 KB] -
[2020] NZEmpC 234 McBride v ANZCO Foods Ltd [PDF, 232 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 234 McBride v ANZCO Foods Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 18 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – plaintiff’s representative accepted responsibility for failing to file challenge – application granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 233 A Labour Inspector v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Puna Liquor Centre [PDF, 165 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 233 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Puna Liquor Centre (Judgment (No 4) of Judge Kathryn Beck, 17 December 2020) DISCHARGE OF FREEZING ORDER – consent.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 232 The Chief of New Zealand Defence Force v Darnley [PDF, 147 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 232 The Chief of New Zealand Defence Force v Darnley (Consent Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 17 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY – consent.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 231 Lye v ISO Ltd [PDF, 255 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 231 Lye v ISO Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 17 December 2020) AVAILABILITY PROVISION – COMPLIANCE ORDER – employee’s collective agreement includes an availability provision – granting a compliance order would have unfair effects on ongoing collective bargaining – compliance order not granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 230 Arachchige v Rasier New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 398 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 230 Arachchige v Rasier New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 17 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR DECLARATION OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP – applicant is driver for Uber – applicant was previously a taxi driver running a business on his own account – applicant’s work was not exclusive to Uber – applicant was not vulnerable or lacking in comprehension – applicant was in control of work hours, equipment, and tax – applicant had ability to increase profitability in some ways – work is integral to Uber’s business but Uber lacked control over how it was undertaken – industry practice not a helpful consideration – applicant was not an employee of Uber.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 229 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [PDF, 223 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 229 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 8) of Judge B A Corkill, 16 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR RECUSAL – no grounds for recusal – application rejected.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 228 Ashby v NIWA Vessel Management Ltd [PDF, 173 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 228 Ashby v NIWA Vessel Management Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 15 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – APPLICATION FOR STAY – no evidence that employee will be unable to pay costs if challenge does not succeed – applications dismissed.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 226 Kohli v Brahmbhatt [PDF, 153 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 226 Kohli v Brahmbhatt (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 14 December 2020) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs awarded.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 227 Wills v Farmlands Co-Operative Society Ltd [PDF, 232 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 227 Wills v Farmlands Co-Operative Society Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 14 December 2020) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – RAISING THE GRIEVANCE – employee discussed grievance with solicitor but no further steps were taken – no clear instruction given to solicitor – grievance was not raised – no exceptional circumstances to allow raising the grievance out of time.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 225 Davis v Idea Services Ltd [PDF, 368 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 225 Davis v Idea Services Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 11 December 2020) HEALTH AND SAFETY – PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – employee raised health and safety issues within time – occupant taken care of by employee displayed escalating pattern of aggressive behaviour – insufficient steps taken to mitigate possible harm to employee – employee sustained injuries, amounting to significant disadvantage.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 224 A Labour Inspector v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd [PDF, 167 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 224 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd (in administration) (Costs Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 11 December 2020) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs awarded.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 223 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v Culturesafe New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 165 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 223 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v Culturesafe New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – application was also made to the Court of Appeal – application adjourned until the Court of Appeal’s ruling.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 222 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd [PDF, 311 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 222 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd (Reasons for Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 9 December 2020) REASONS FOR DISCHARGE ORDER AND CHALLENGE TO INTERIM INJUNUCTION BEING GRANTED – order was granted in earlier judgment – employment agreements were tied to commercial issues – commercial issues must be resolved in general jurisdiction – balance of convenience and interest of justice favour point against interim injunction and continuing freezing orders.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 221 Kang v Lee [PDF, 138 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 221 Kang v Lee (Consent Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 8 December 2020) CONSENT.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 220 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd [PDF, 164 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 220 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 December 2020) APPLICATION TO DISCHARGE FREEZING ORDERS – CHALLENGE TO INTERIM INJUNCTION ORDER - granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 219 Ward v Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 282 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 219 Ward v Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 4 December 2020) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – dismissal is assessed objectively so employee can be dismissed without knowing it – employee was dismissed – dismissal was not justifiable - $30,000 awarded for compensation – employee’s lack of active mitigation viewed in context of mental health issues – 15 months of lost wages awarded – no reduction for contribution.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 218 EPB Ltd v OST [PDF, 217 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 218 EPB Ltd v OST (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 4 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – clear reasons for challenge being out of time – application granted - COSTS – employer discontinued challenge – costs awarded.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 217 Kaukau T/A Sew & Sew v Hiri-Gualeni [PDF, 159 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 217 Kaukau T/A Sew & Sew v Hiri-Gualeni (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – not opposed – application granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 216 Hatcher v Burgess Crowley Civil Ltd [PDF, 158 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 216 Hatcher v Burgess Crowley Civil Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 December 2020) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE - $20,000 awarded for costs.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 215 Edwards v Recreational Services Ltd [PDF, 144 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 215 Edwards v Recreational Services Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 4 December 2020) APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE - consent.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 214 Humphreys v Humphreys [PDF, 171 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 214 Humphreys v Humphreys (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 2 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LITIGATION GUARDIAN – defendant is incapacitated – no objection to appointment of litigation guardian – litigation guardian appointed.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 213 New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd v Flashoff [PDF, 178 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 213 New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd v Flashoff (Interlocutory Judgment (No 4) of Judge B A Corkill, 1 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF A FREEZING ORDER – freezing order renewed.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 212 BL & SL Porter Ltd v Higgs [PDF, 160 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 212 BL & SL Porter Ltd v Higgs (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 1 December 2020) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – proceedings were discontinued – $2000 awarded.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 211 Kim v Lion [PDF, 169 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 211 Kim v Lion (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 1 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR SANCTIONS FOR BREACH OF A COMPLIANCE ORDER – Authority compliance order has not been fully satisfied – hearing adjourned to provide further opportunity to make payment.