[2019] NZEmpC 7 Sawyer v Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 4 February 2019) APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS – parties do not object to application – principles must still be considered – application is for a legitimate purpose – application granted.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3642 items matching your search terms
-
[2019] NZEmpC 7 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [PDF, 336 KB] -
[2019] NZEmpC 6 Cornish Trucks and Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [PDF, 279 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 6 Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 February 2019) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – whether employee was dismissed or resigned – contradiction in evidence between parties – employee version of events more credible – employee was unjustifiably dismissed - $6000 awarded for lost wages – for compensation, the statement of defence only asked for $7000 – compensation cannot be higher than requested in pleadings – compensation cannot be for post-employment conduct of the employer - $7000 awarded for compensation – no reduction made for contribution.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 5 Hatcher v Burgess Crowley Civil Ltd [PDF, 268 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 5 Hatcher v Burgess Crowley Civil Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 4 February 2019) APPLICATION AS TO SCOPE OF CHALLENGE – whether statement of claim raises issues beyond those dealt with by the Authority – issue was raised in the Authority but Member declined to investigate it - definition of the word “matter” – the issues were an aspect of the matter before the Authority, albeit un-investigated.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 4 Aslan Farms Ltd v Johnstone [PDF, 280 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 4 Aslan Farms Ltd v Johnstone (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 30 January 2019) CONSENT – parties reached agreed terms of settlement – publication of the contents is prohibited.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 3 NZPPTA v BOT for Rodney College [PDF, 165 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 3 New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association v Board of Trustees for Rodney College (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 29 January 2019) APPLICATION FOR VERIFICATION ORDER – alleged documents not disclosed – no affidavit asserting that all documents are disclosed – verification order granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 2 Clearkin v Geneva Healthcare Ltd [PDF, 276 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 2 Clearkin v Geneva Healthcare Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 23 January 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – interests of justice considered – application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 1 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd [PDF, 222 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 1 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 22 January 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FURTHER EVIDENCE – relevance of evidence – application granted.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 161 Aslan Farms Ltd v Johnstone [PDF, 324 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 161 Aslan Farms Ltd v Johnstone (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 December 2018) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION – URGENCY – both stays granted to preserve position – interim terms and conditions remain, but defendant not to undertake any duties – parties directed to mediation.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 160 Kaikorai Service Centre Ltd v First Union Inc [PDF, 418 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 160 Kaikorai Service Centre Ltd v First Union Inc (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 20 December 2018) COLLECTIVE BARGAINING – whether refusing to bargain collective about wages is a breach of good faith – whether large inflatable rat is breach of good faith by union – whether wage scale must be included in collective agreement – Act does not require wages to be included –duty of good faith does not mean wage scale must be included – no breach of good faith – inflatable rat an exercise of free speech – no defamation – not a breach of good faith.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 159 X v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [PDF, 365 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 159 X v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 20 December 2018) COSTS – no uplift as Calderback offer did not address all concerns – impecuniosity not adequately supported – defendant should not be deprived of benefit of order – costs of $23,638 ordered.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 157 Alkazaz v Spectrum Consulting Ltd [PDF, 230 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 157 Alkazaz v Spectrum Consulting Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 20 December 2018) CONSENT – full and final settlement – terms confidential.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 158 Solid Roofing Ltd v Newman [PDF, 183 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 158 Solid Roofing Ltd v Newman (Consent Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 19 December 2018) CONSENT – confidential terms
-
[2018] NZEmpC 156 NZ Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees’ Union (Wellington Branch) v Cityline (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 272 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 156 New Zealand Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees’ Union (Wellington Branch) v Cityline (NZ) Limited (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 19 December 2018) CONTRACT INTERPRETATION – whether lawful for employees covered by Valley Flyer agreement to work within Wellington City – factual background considered – consultation adequate – no geographical limit in CEA – no implied term – yes, it is lawful.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 153 Rauland NZ Limited v Delvo [PDF, 224 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 153 Rauland NZ Ltd v Delvo (Reasons for Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 18 December 2018) SEARCH ORDER – REASONS – suspected breach of confidentiality and restraint of trade – strong prima facie case established – without notice and urgency appropriate.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 155 Mani and Icon Concepts 2012 Ltd v Sharma [PDF, 221 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 155 Mani and Icon Concepts 2012 Limited v Sharma (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 18 December 2018) SECURITY FOR COSTS – difficulties for defendant in seeking payment of monies ordered by Authority – application for security for costs granted – challenge stayed until payment made into Court.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 154 TUV v WXY [PDF, 512 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 154 TUV v WXY (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 18 December 2018) SECTION 149 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT – MENTAL INCAPACITY – whether s 149 prevents an agreement being invalidated for mental incapacity – purpose and legislative history of s 149 discussed – s 149 not unassailable – difference between protection of agreed terms and validity of agreement as a whole – employee was mentally incapable – employer did not know – no unconscionability – no duress – s 149 agreement not set aside – non-publication orders – public interest in parties’ identities – agreement for confidentiality relevant but not decisive – defendant name to be published but plaintiff not.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 151 Ovation New Zealand Ltd v The New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc [PDF, 1.3 MB] [2018] NZEmpC 151 Ovation New Zealand Ltd v The New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 17 December 2018) PIECE WORK - REST BREAKS – WHETHER DONNING AND DOFFING IS WORK - case law considered – S 69ZD(3) starting-point –entitlement to be paid – Part 6D does not specify means or method – incorporating paid rest breaks into piece rates is lawful – onus on employer to establish rest breaks paid at correct rate - no evidence paid rest breaks included in CEA or historically – no compliance with statutory requirement – donning and doffing time is work, currently not paid – any remedies must be specifically pleaded.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 152 Watts & Hughes Construction Ltd v de Buyzer [PDF, 285 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 152 Watts & Hughes Construction Ltd v de Buyzer (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 17 December 2018) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CHALLENGE OUT OF TIME – STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – inadvertence and one day late – leave granted to file out of time – stay granted on condition sums involved are paid into the Court.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 149 Rauland NZ Limited v Delvo [PDF, 150 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 149 Rauland NZ Ltd v Delvo (Interim Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 14 December 2018) APPLICATION FOR SEARCH ORDER – urgency and without notice appropriate – strong prima facie case established – order granted.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 150 Molenaar v Rigg Stuff Ltd [PDF, 370 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 150 Molenaar v Rigg Stuff Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 14 December 2018) FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS – for each of pleadings in statement of claim - opposed but without submissions – application partially successful – further and better particulars specified.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 148 Bowen v Bank of NZ [PDF, 218 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 148 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 10 December 2018) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING ORDER AND PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE – laptop and iPhone – BNZ proposal for preservation – whether grounds for preservation order established – proposal accepted but no orders made.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 147 Amcor Flexibles (NZ) Ltd v Gillan [PDF, 403 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 147 Amcor Flexibles (New Zealand) Ltd v Gillan (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 10 December 2018) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - MEDICAL INCAPACITY – seizures – return to work and management plan in place – numerous medical reports – company made strenuous efforts – actions of a fair and reasonable employer - challenge successful.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 146 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [PDF, 272 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 146 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 6) of Judge B A Corkill, 6 December 2018) STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL – stay application granted pending appeal by defendant – fixture will not proceed.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 145 FGH v RST [PDF, 252 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 145 FGH v RST (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 6 December 2018) PERMANENT NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – application granted – identifying details permanently suppressed.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 144 FGH v RST [PDF, 227 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 144 FGH v RST (Consent Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 6 December 2018) CONSENT – sum of $165,000– less applicable deductions to be paid to lawyers’ trust account.