[2023] NZEmpC 125 Supercity Towing Ltd v Huch (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 11 August 2023) APPLICATION FOR STAY – no basis for stay – application declined.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3640 items matching your search terms
-
[2023] NZEmpC 125 Supercity Towing Ltd v Huch [PDF, 199 KB] -
[2023] NZEmpC 123 Boulton v Food Thingy Ltd T/A Bird the Word [PDF, 190 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 123 Boulton v Food Thingy Ltd T/A Bird the Word (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 11 August 2023) SECURITY FOR COSTS – application not granted – plaintiff not shown to be impecunious.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 122 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Roy [PDF, 226 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 122 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Roy (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 11 August 2023) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs awarded.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 121 Safari Construction (2005) Ltd v Dunning [PDF, 186 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 121 Safari Construction (2005) Ltd v Dunning (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 11 August 2023) APPLICATION FOR NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS – no basis for order – application declined.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 120 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno [PDF, 169 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 120 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno (Costs Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 9 August 2023) COSTS – sought costs were less than guideline scale costs – costs awarded.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 119 MNO v PQR [PDF, 155 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 119 MNO v PQR (Judgment (No 2) of Judge Kathryn Beck, 7 August 2023) FREEZING ORDERS – ANCILLARY ORDERS – freezing orders extended for limited further period – ancillary orders made.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 118 Halse v Hamilton City Council [PDF, 209 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 118 Halse v Hamilton City Council (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 7 August 2023) APPLICATION FOR RECUSAL - previous judgments against applicant were not plainly erroneous - previous adverse statements were not unfair or excessive - no grounds for recusal - application declined.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 117 Downer New Zealand Ltd v King [PDF, 240 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 117 Downer New Zealand Ltd v King (Reasons Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 3 August 2023) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING ORDER - extremely good arguable case for breach of duty and of employment agreement - assets are held within jurisdiction - real risk established that the assets may be disposed of - balance of convenience favours freezing order - application granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 116 TPT Forests Ltd v Penfold [PDF, 115 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 116 TPT Forests Ltd v Penfold (Consent Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 2 August 2023) CONSENT.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 115 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno [PDF, 226 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 115 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge Kathryn Beck, 27 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLEADINGS – interests of justice favour granting application – application granted - APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – no evidence of potential inability to pay future costs award – application declined.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 114 Jeon v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [PDF, 196 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 114 Jeon v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 27 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR STAY – insufficient evidence that stay is required to protect applicant’s challenge rights – balance of convenience weighs against granting stay – application declined.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 113 Snowling v Scott Technology Ltd [PDF, 195 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 113 Snowling v Scott Technology Ltd (Interim Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 26 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR STAY - contemporaneous applications for stay and security for costs present difficulty - stay granted on an interim basis until security for costs is argued.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 112 MW v Spiga Ltd [PDF, 158 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 112 MW v Spiga Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Judge B A Corkill, 25 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR INTERVENER STATUS – applicants would assist the Court with their respective perspectives – application granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 111 Lu v Young [PDF, 226 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 111 Lu v Young (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 24 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR STAY – no grounds for a stay – application declined – APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – respondent has admitted they have cashflow issues – balance of interest favours granting application – application granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 110 Hamilton Hindin Greene Ltd v Smalley [PDF, 222 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 110 Hamilton Hindin Greene Ltd v Smalley (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 July 2023) COSTS ON DISCONTINUANCE – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs awarded with adjustments.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 109 MNO v PQR [PDF, 217 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 109 MNO v PQR (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 24 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING AND ANCILLARY ORDERS – interim non-publication order granted – arguable case within the jurisdiction established – real risk of dissipation – balance of convenience favours granting the application – application granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 108 MGK Homes Ltd v Yoon [PDF, 221 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 108 MGK Homes Ltd v Yoon (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge Kathryn Beck, 19 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – whether respondent has equity in property assets – “as is” property value used instead of rateable value – actual loan amount used instead of priority sums – respondent has sufficient assets to meet potential costs award – application declined.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 106 Ling v Super Cuisine Group Ltd [PDF, 254 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 106 Ling v Super Cuisine Group Ltd (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 13 July 2023) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – employer breached conditions of employment – employee did not realise breach but breach still induced employee to seek alternative employment – resignation was reasonably foreseeable – employee was constructively dismissed – remedies awarded.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 107 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [PDF, 180 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 107 Pilgrim v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 34) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 13 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO IN-COURT VIDEO FOOTAGE - footage to be used in documentary - proceedings are of significant public interest - application granted with conditions.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 105 Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors - Media Release [PDF, 165 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 105 Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors - Media Release
-
[2023] NZEmpC 105 Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors [PDF, 596 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 105 Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 13 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR DECLARATION OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS - workers undertook cooking, cleaning, laundry and food preparation duties in religious community - work was rewarded by necessities of life and being permitted to remain in the community - workers were not volunteers - work being "domestic" in nature not a relevant factor - work was in the nature of employment according to objective indicators - employment status is not inconsistent with community's religious freedom - workers were employees - application granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 104 Chantama v McKerchar Lamb Ltd [PDF, 188 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 104 Chantama v McKerchar Lamb Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 12 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – application not opposed – delay was short and occasioned by miscalculation – application granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 103 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Knight [PDF, 150 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 103 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Knight (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 5 July 2023) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs awarded.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 102 van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd [PDF, 273 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 102 van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Judge B A Corkill, 3 July 2023) APPLICATION FOR FURTHER AND BETTER DISCLOSURE – obligation to disclose has been discharged – application dismissed - APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION – significant delay by employee – employee’s cause of action is not without merit – interests of justice point away from strike out – application dismissed.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 101 GF v Comptroller of Customs [PDF, 513 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 101 GF v Comptroller of Customs (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 30 June 2023) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – UNJUSTIFIED DISADAVANTAGE – TIKANGA – PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYER “GOOD EMPLOYER” OBLIGATIONS – dismissal in relation to COVID-19 vaccine – unvaccinated worker – tikanga a relevant consideration – employer incorporated tikanga/tikanga values into relationship – at very least should have been considered – Public Service Act 2020 good employer standard – heightened obligations on public service employers – deficient communication and engagement with employees choosing not to be vaccinated – no individualised health and safety assessment – predetermined outcome – process failed to meet the baseline fair and reasonable employer standard – breach of good faith – UPDATE TO COMPENSATION BANDS – $25,000 compensation – 3 months’ lost wages awarded – formal recommendations made.