[2022] NZEmpC 239 Butt v Attorney-General (Costs Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 23 December 2022) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – no circumstances to justify uplift – costs awarded.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3640 items matching your search terms
-
[2022] NZEmpC 239 Butt v Attorney-General [PDF, 205 KB] -
[2022] NZEmpC 235 THL (2005) and ors v NEN and MDL [PDF, 179 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 235 THL (2005) and ors v NEN and MDL (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 19 December 2022) FREEZING ORDER – freezing order and ancillary orders granted – non-publication orders granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 238 Annex Group Ltd v Alfiorovis [PDF, 145 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 238 Annex Group Ltd v Alfiorovas (Consent Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 19 December 2022) CONSENT.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 237 De Sousa v Dehlsen [PDF, 112 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 237 De Sousa v Dehlsen (Consent Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 19 December 2022) CONSENT.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 236 TPT Forests Ltd v Penfold [PDF, 182 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 236 TPT Forests Ltd v Penfold (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 19 November 2022) CHALLENGE TO OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE - parties reached agreement on majority of documents - public interest privilege and common interest privilege are inapplicable - "without prejudice" communications should not be disclosed - other documents to be disclosed.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 233 Baillie v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children [PDF, 280 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 233 Baillie v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 16 December 2022) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE - UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL - employer did not sufficiently establish finding of serious misconduct - summary dismissal was unjustifiable - reinstatement practicable and reasonable - reinstatement ordered - lost wages and compensation awarded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 234 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [PDF, 685 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 234 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 15 December 2022) PENALTIES – QUANTUM OF PENALTIES – numerous breaches by multiple companies against multiple employees – total of $1.5m awarded in penalties – banning orders made.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 232 Kang v Saena Company Ltd [PDF, 249 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 232 Kang v Saena Company Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 14 December 2022) COSTS - legal aid - uplift for Calderbank offer - adjusted for partial success - costs awarded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 231 New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc v Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand [PDF, 189 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 231 New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc v Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 13 December 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AS INTERVENER – application not opposed – applicant is justly entitled to be heard – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 230 Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand v CultureSafe New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 213 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 230 Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand v CultureSafe New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 13 December 2022) APPLICATION FOR AUDIO RECORDINGS – not appropriate to provide audio – whether transcript should be provided – transcript already exists so no risk of wasting court resources – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 229 AlKazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [PDF, 195 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 229 AlKazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 9 December 2022) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – no basis for reduction – small uplift granted because of pursuing issues that had been determined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 228 Hairland Holdings Ltd v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [PDF, 160 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 228 Hairland Holdings Ltd v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Judge K G Smith, 9 December 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY – application granted by consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 227 Chen v WNY Group Ltd [PDF, 358 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 227 Chen v WNY Group Ltd (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 8 December 2022) NATURE OF EMPLOYMENT – whether plaintiff was an employee – plaintiff was not required to and did not undertake any work – payments made by defendant of unclear purpose – judgment to be referred to Department of Internal Affairs – plaintiff was not an employee.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 226 Association of Professionals and Executive Employees Inc (APEX) v Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand [PDF, 228 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 226 Association of Professionals and Executive Employees Inc (APEX) v Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 7 December 2022) UNLAWFUL PREFERENCE – employer provided a preference to one union over the other by increasing penal rates on the basis of union membership – intention behind preference is not relevant for the purpose of s 9 – employer did not breach duty of good faith.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 224 AlKazaz v Enterprise IT LTD [PDF, 179 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 224 AlKazaz v Enterprise IT LTD (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 7 December 2022) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs awarded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 223 FGH v RST [PDF, 688 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 223 FGH v RST (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 6 December 2022) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE - UNJUSTIFIABLE DISADVANTAGE - social media posts can be subject of disciplinary process - initiating employment investigation into social media posts was fair and reasonable in the circumstances - placing employee on paid sick leave was fair and reasonable in the circumstances - employee was not unjustifiably disadvantaged.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 222 Gumbeze v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki [PDF, 225 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 222 Gumbeze v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 5 December 2022) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – delay was brief and adequately explained – no prejudice to respondent if application was granted – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 221 Pilgrim v The Attorney-General [PDF, 179 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 221 Pilgrim v The Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 1) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 2 December 2022) APPOINTMENT OF COURT EXPERT – expert appointed.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 219 Hynds Pipe Systems Ltd v Cheng [PDF, 124 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 219 Hynds Pipe Systems Ltd v Cheng (Oral Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 1 December 2022) SEARCH ORDER – search order concluded – further orders made by consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 220 Shah Enterprise NZ Ltd v A Labour Inspector [PDF, 164 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 220 Shah Enterprise NZ Ltd v A Labour Inspector of Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 1 December 2022) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs awarded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 218 New Zealand Nurses Organisation v Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand [PDF, 326 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 218 New Zealand Nurses Organisation v Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 30 November 2022) APPLICATION FOR A REPRESENTATION ORDER – unions have standing and are entitled to represent their members – union members have common interest – representation order made – DISCLOSURE – notice of disclosure restricted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 217 Karunanayake v FED [PDF, 191 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 217 Karunanayake v FED (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 30 November 2022) NATURE OF EMPLOYMENT – defendant was an employee – defendant must be paid for work done – unpaid wages and holiday pay awarded – NON-PUBLICATION – Court recognises publication of the defendant’s name may harm future employment prospects – proceedings were simply taken to enforce minimum employment standards and should not result in such consequences – non-publication granted for defendant – non-publication not granted for plaintiff.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 216 Caisteal An Ime Ltd v Faithfull [PDF, 240 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 216 Caisteal An Ime Ltd v Faithfull (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 30 November 2022) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE - UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL - employee was permanent part-time, not casual - employee did not resign but was constructively dismissed - no justification for dismissal - Authority had miscalculated lost wages - remedies for lost wage reduced - challenge otherwise dismissed.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 215 Drivesure Ltd v McQuillan [PDF, 154 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 215 Drivesure Ltd v McQuillan (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 30 November 2022) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs awarded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 214 Yu v Joe and Zhou Ltd [PDF, 142 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 214 Yu v Joe and Zhou Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 29 November 2022) CONSENT.