[2022] NZEmpC 42 TPT Forests Ltd v Penfold (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge J C Holden, 11 March 2022) APPLICATION FOR CONSEQUENTIAL ORDERS.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3642 items matching your search terms
-
[2022] NZEmpC 42 TPT Forests Ltd v Penfold [PDF, 219 KB] -
[2022] NZEmpC 41 GF v Comptroller of the New Zealand Customs Service [PDF, 177 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 41 GF v Comptroller of the New Zealand Customs Service (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 10 March 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AS INTERVENER – applicant has interest in proceedings – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 40 Ngawaka v Global Security Solutions Ltd [PDF, 219 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 40 Ngawaka v Global Security Solutions Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 9 March 2022) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – employee was under pressure due to investigation and resigned – pressure does not amount to constructive dismissal.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 39 Malcolm v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [PDF, 332 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 39 Malcolm v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 9 March 2022) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PROCEEDING – amended statement of claim challenged lawfulness of COVID-19 Vaccinations Order – Employment Court no jurisdiction to determine lawfulness of Order – no reasonably arguable cause of action – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 38 Mataura Valley Milk Ltd v Scott [PDF, 145 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 38 Mataura Valley Milk Ltd v Scott (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 9 March 2022) SEARCH ORDER – VARIATION.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 37 E Tu Inc v Rasier Operations BV [PDF, 192 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 37 E Tu Inc v Rasier Operations BV (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 8 March 2022) APPLICATION FOR AUDIO-VISUAL LINK – travel issues – application not opposed – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 36 Kang v Saena Company Ltd [PDF, 231 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 36 Kang v Saena Company Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 March 2022) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING ORDERS AND ANCILIARY ORDERS – good arguable case established – no evidence of assets within jurisdiction at risk of dissipation – application dismissed.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 34 Henderson Travels Ltd v Kaur [PDF, 210 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 34 Henderson Travels Ltd v Kaur (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 March 2022) Application for stay of Authority determination – concern about ability to repay – payment of amount into Court – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 35 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 225 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 35 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 7) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 4 March 2022) APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS – open justice – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 33 Capital and Coast District Health Board v Public Service Association, Te Pukenga Here Tikanga Mahi [PDF, 311 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 33 Capital and Coast District Health Board v Public Service Association, Te Pukenga Here Tikanga Mahi (Reasons for Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 4 March 2022) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM INJUNCTION – arguable that strike related to equal pay claim and not collective bargaining – significant consequences to strike on hospital operations – balance of convenience favours granting injunction in context of pandemic – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 32 Capital and Coast District Health Board v Public Service Association, Te Pukenga Here Tikanga Mahi [PDF, 148 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 32 Capital and Coast District Health Board v Public Service Association, Te Pukenga Here Tikanga Mahi (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 3 March 2022) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM INJUNCTION – application granted – full reasons to follow.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 31 Kennedy v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children [PDF, 148 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 31 Kennedy v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children (Consent Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 28 February 2022) CONSENT.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 30 Cousens v Star Nelson Holdings Ltd [PDF, 210 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 30 Cousens v Star Nelson Holdings Ltd (Oral Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 24 February 2022) COMPLIANCE ORDER – PENALTY – compliance order of Authority was not complied with – penalty awarded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 29 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 166 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 29 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 6) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 23 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR IN-COURT MEDIA COVERAGE – proceedings are of significant public interest – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 28 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in rec) v Milne [PDF, 142 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 28 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in rec) v Milne (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 February 2022) CONSENT – costs settled by consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 27 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 232 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 27 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 5) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 18 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS – no evidence of commercial sensitivity – no specific adverse consequences in relation to privacy concerns – application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 26 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust [PDF, 192 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 26 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 16 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – claim does not obviously lack merit – no evidence of impecuniosity – no evidence of a pattern of litigious behaviour – application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 25 UBP Ltd v Rantiaawa-Kaui [PDF, 219 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 25 UBP Ltd v Rantiaawa-Kaui (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 16 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION – risk of challenge being rendered ineffectual – challenge being pursued in good faith – balance of convenience favours granting stay – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 24 Drivesure Ltd v McQuillan [PDF, 180 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 24 Drivesure Ltd v McQuillan (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 15 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A CHALLENGE – delay was caused by representative error and was modest – public interest in challenge – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 23 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 180 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 23 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 4) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 11 February 2022) APPLICATION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND/OR CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES – cross-examination allowed – evidence not excluded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 22 Cross v Air New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 107 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 22 Cross v Air New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 11 February 2022) NON-PUBLICATION of certain documents – granted by consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 21 Baillie v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki - Ministry for Children [PDF, 222 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 21 Baillie v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki - Ministry for Children (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 11 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM REINSTATEMENT – serious question to be tried – no evidence of previous disciplinary matters – satisfied that defendant would be able to have plaintiff at work without undue health and safety risk – period of interim reinstatement relatively short – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 20 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 195 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 20 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 11 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO REQUIRE ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES – relevance is arguable – requested interrogatories are oppressive with limited time until hearing – application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 19 Kang v Saena Company Ltd [PDF, 175 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 19 Kang v Saena Company Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 10 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS – applicant should be allowed to increase quantum of remedies sought – application granted – APPLICATION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE – evidence to be included but taken into account when considering costs – ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE – part of evidence contains reference to mediation – offending paragraphs to be struck out.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 18 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 173 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 18 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge Inglis, 10 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR IN-COURT MEDIA COVERAGE – proceedings have public importance and genuine public interest – privacy concerns can be addressed – applicant I bound by rules and protocols to alleviate possibility of unbalanced reporting – application granted.