Search Results

1. Biel v Hall - Opepe Farm Trust [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 535 (2011 APPEAL 535) [pdf, 222 KB]

   RAMEKA V HALL MAC 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 535 25 October 2011 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 535 (2011 APPEAL 535) A20100012260 IN THE MATTER OF Opepe Farm Trust BETWEEN EMILY RAMEKA AND PUTIPUTI BIEL Appellants AND WILLIAM TEMUERA ROBERT HALL Respondent Hearing: 8 February 2011 (Heard at Rotorua) Court: Chief Judge WW Isaac (Presiding) Judge CT Coxhead Judge SF Reeves

2. [2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority [pdf, 519 KB]

   ...in the Aviation Security Service”.3 [10] The CA Act confers certain powers upon ASOs, such as the power to search, to detain persons and to seize property.4 Those officers are warranted. The Act then 2 Civil Aviation Act 1990, s 80. 3 Section 72B(2)(ca). 4 Sections 80A–80H. grants certain protections to those officers, providing they act in good faith and perform their duties under the CA Act.5 [11] The role of ASOs is provided for in a multi-union collectiv...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 029 New Zealand Motor Caravan Association Inc v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...Inc. Consent Type: Subdivision (Allotment Creation) Consent Number: U220749.01 Lapse Date: This consent will lapse on 1 February 2029 unless given effect to prior to that date (i.e. the completed survey plan must be lodged for approval under section 223 Resource Management Act 1991 no later than this date). Establishment Conditions: Condition 1 Part 3, Section: Section 11(1)(a) of the Resource Management Act 1991. Pursuant to sections 34A(1) and 104B and after having regard to...

4. [2020] NZEnvC 181 BW Offshore Singapore Pte Ltd v Environmental Protection Authority.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...decisions, the EPA issued these abatement notices under s 125 EEZ, which required immediate compliance. Application for stay was made, and those matters have been dealt with by the appropriate courts. An appeal was filed under s 129 EEZ which, under subsection (3), provides that appeals shall be dealt with under Part 11 of the RMA: (3) Part 11 of the Resource Management Act applies as if the appeal were lodged under Part 12 of that Act. [12] Although there has been some question as...

5. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 TGKL case law 2 Paku Bay [pdf, 142 KB]

   Guardians of Paku Bay Association Inc v Waikato Regional Council High Court, Auckland (CIV-2010-404-8097) Wylie J 24 May; 25 July 2011 Resource management — Activity — Non-complying — Plans and schemes — Coastal — Marina — Appeal — Applicants successfully sought the introduction of marina zones and unsuccessfully sought resource and related land use consents for a 150-berth marina — Applicants had reduced and amended a proposal for a 95-berth marina approved — Environment

6. [2015] NZEmpC 34 Rodkiss v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [pdf, 349 KB]

   DAVID RODKISS v CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 34 [24 March 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 34 CRC 52/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DAVID RODKISS Plaintiff AND CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 19, 20, 21, 22 August and 28, 29, 30, 31 October 2014 and submissions filed on 5 and 14 November 201

7. LCRO 78/2017 UT v HB (26 June 2019) [pdf, 346 KB]

   ...has no bearing on Ms UT’s complaint. [127] The parties take entirely opposing views about the steps, if any, Mr HB was to take to gauge the likelihood of success an application under section 14 to have the proposed 2009 will declared valid. [128] In the absence of any compelling evidence from Ms UT that Mr HB gave her this assurance, I am not able to take this aspect of her complaint any further. Family arrangement — negotiations [129] On 12 February 2010, Mr BD wrote to Mr CT...

8. Derham v Accident Compensation Corporation (Gradual Process Injury; Suspension of Entitlements) [2025] NZACC 026 (17 February 2025) [pdf, 246 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 026 ACAR 074/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN CARL DERHAM Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 3 December 2025 Heard at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: Mr Hinchcliff for the appellant Ms Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 17 Fe

9. [2012] NZEmpC 51 New Zealand Cards Ltd v Ramsay [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...Authority. They were reimbursement of lost wages equivalent to three months’ ordinary time pay and compensation of $12,000. [60] There is an obvious difficulty with the claim for reimbursement of lost wages. The statutory remedy provided for in s 128 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 is for money lost “as a result of the grievance”. After he was dismissed, Mr Ramsay elected to become a full time care giver for his mother. While that was admirable, the result was that he...

10. LCRO 113-2017 GN v IG [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...nature of legal practice and the issues that frequently arise. Their determinations are a form of peer review of their colleagues. [127] Committees include at least one layperson, who brings a consumer’s perspective to the deliberations. [128] As such, a Committee is well placed to assess the seriousness of a lawyer’s conduct. [129] That being said, I do not consider that Mr GN’s conduct was at the higher end of unsatisfactory. In my view, a fine of $7000 appropriately ref...