Search Results

1. Robb v Complaints Assessment Committee [2017] NZREADT 39 [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...2017 ____________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL ____________________________________________________________________ Introduction [1] Mr Robb faces two charges of misconduct under section 73(c)(iii) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (“the Act”), laid by Complaints Assessment Committee 304 (“CAC 403”). On both charges Mr Robb is charged in the alternative with unsatisfactory conduct under s 72 of the Act. [2]...

2. [2020] NZEmpC 60 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...Court. Specifically, ss 11(1)(a) and 15(1)(d) of that Act requires a reporting entity such as a lawyers’ firm to conduct enhanced due diligence. This included a duty to verify the identity of the customer and obtain that person’s address. Section 31(1) requires a law firm to conduct ongoing customer due diligence. These obligations applied in the circumstances. GRL had breached its statutory obligations. A reporting entity not conducting customer due diligence could be lia...

3. LCRO 88/2022 GX v EJ (2 April 2024) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...without agreement of all trustees. They also include matters where Mr OM acted unilaterally and beyond the control of Mr EJ. [127] In addition to the above, these allegations of bias are clearly an allegation that the trustee has acted unfairly. [128] Again, that is not a matter to be addressed by the complaints process. Referral to another law firm [129] Ms GX suggests that Mr EJ had a duty to refer the trustees of the Trust to another law firm for advice. [130] PQRS offered...

4. [2024] NZIACDT 15 – YT v CX (14 May 2024) [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...in its discretion request further information or any person to appear before the Tribunal.5 It has been established to deal relatively summarily with complaints referred to it.6 4 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) and (3). 5 Section 49(3) and (4). 6 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 7 [23] After hearing a complaint, the Tribunal may dismiss it, uphold it but take no further action or uphold it and impos...

5. NZCVS 2024 Cycle 7 How much crime [xlsx, 64 KB]

   ...(261-317) 288 (256-321) 254 (230-279) 237 (210-264) ^ 17.7 (16.0-19.3) 14.1 (12.7-15.4) 16.0 (14.5-17.5) 14.9 (13.2-16.6) 12.9 (11.6-14.1) 11.8 (10.5-13.1) ^ Vehicle Offences 116 (101-130) 118 (103-132) 116 (103-128) 151 (132-170) 162 (144-179) 137 (119-154) 6.6 (5.8-7.4) 6.6 (5.7-7.4) 6.4 (5.7-7.1) 7.8 (6.8-8.8) 8.2 (7.3-9.0) 6.8 (5.9-7.7) Trespass 41 (33-49) 50 (38-62) 58 (42-75) 60 (43-78) 4...

6. [2025] NZIACDT 44 – SC v Wharekura (28 August 2025) [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...in its discretion request further information or any person to appear before the Tribunal.5 It has been established to deal relatively summarily with complaints referred to it.6 4 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) and (3). 5 Section 49(3) and (4). 6 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 9 [31] After hearing a complaint, the Tribunal may dismiss it, uphold it but take no further action or uphold it and impose...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 247 Allied Asphalt Limited [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...required and the consent application process 22 B1 Consents required under the Tauranga City Plan 22 B2 Consents required under the Bay of Plenty Regional Natural Resources Plan 23 B3 Notification 24 B4 Submissions 24 B5 Consultation 25 B6 Section 274 Notices 28 B7 The Court process 30 B8 Approach taken by the Court in relation to the changing state of knowledge about air quality management in the Mount Maunganui Airshed and the on-going evolution of the planning environme...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 250 Granger & Ors v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 13 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [20181 NZEnvC 250 of the Resource Management Act 1991· of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act GRAEME GRANGER, CRAIG WERNER, HAMISH FORRESTER, KATRINA BERKENBUSCH, MEGAN BARDELL, TOM MYERS (ENV-2017 -CHC-038) Appellants DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent PENINSULA HOLDINGS TRUST Applicant Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commission

9. [2023] NZEnvC 027 AJ & VF Barr Family Trust v Whakatane District Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...to the Whakatane District Council or the Bay of Plenty Regional Council or any other party concerning such effects arising from rural activities that are being carried out lawfully. This is commonly referred to as a reverse sensitivity notice. Section 290A RMA As we noted already, the Commissioners issued a decision granting consent. To the extent, we are able to tell from the decision itself and the evidence given to us, the same or similar issues were raised on behalf of Mrs B...

10. LCRO 145/2023 ET v PU (25 February 2025) [pdf, 241 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 019 Ref: LCRO 145/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN ET Applicant AND PU Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr ET has applie...