LCRO 239/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN AB Applicant AND CD Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms AB has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee (the Committee), whic...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2020] NZLCRO 31 Ref: LCRO 123/2019 LCRO 124/2019 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN MC Applicant AND QK Respondent AND BETWEEN QK Applicant AND MC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the par...
...Committee at its meeting on Thursday 13 December 2007. 2. We have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. In reaching this conclusion, we considered potential inconsistencies with sections 14, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 25(c), and 27(1) of the Bill of Rights Act. 3. The following summary provides you with: • A brief overview of the contents of the Bill; • A note of the provisions of the Bill which appear to raise...
Before the Environment Court at Auckland ENV-2013-AKL-000174 In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And In the Matter of a Notice of Motion under Section 87G requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish a Marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf Statement of Rebuttal Evidence by Maxwell Joseph Dunn On behalf of Waiheke Marinas Ltd Dated 26 September 2014
Cooper v Kaipara District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 143 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act/RMA) BETWEEN ALMA AND PETER COOPER, AMY AND GREG CRAMOND, NIKKI HARRIS, SUSAN HODKINSON, NATASHA AND JOHN LEE, JONATHAN AND PATRICIA MCKINNEY (ENV-2022-AKL-000142) Appellants AND KAIPARA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND VERMONT STREET PARTNERS L
EVANS v MDC – FINAL DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 110 IN THE MATTER of the Biosecurity Act 1993 AND of an application under s76 of the Act BETWEEN GEOFFREY IAN TUDOR EVANS (ENV-2020-CHC-105) Applicant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environment Commissioner S Myers Hearing: On the papers Last case event: 24 April 2024 Date of D
62 Tairawhiti MB 122 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRĀWHITI DISTRICT A20150003384 UNDER Sections 19(1)(a) and 20 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waipaoa 5A2 – Injunction and Recovery of Māori Freehold Land BETWEEN THE MĀORI TRUSTEE Applicant AND BRUCE WINSTON ANDERSON SMITH Respondent A20140012500 A20150003329 A20150003333 UNDER Sections 240 and 43 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MA...
BREAD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN AUCKLAND v XI (ROBERT) CHEN [2025] NZEmpC 69 [4 April 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 69 EMPC 141/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BREAD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN AUCKLAND Plaintiff AND XI (ROBERT) CHEN Defendant EMPC 181/2024 IN T
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court:1 Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 133 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act DARBY PLANNING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ENV-2018-CHC-150) and all other appellants concerning Topic 1 of Stage 1 of the Proposed Queenstown Lakes District Plan (as set out in the Schedule attached) Appellants QUEENS
...reviews (this was abandoned at the hearing upon concession as to limitation); d) breach of Principle 11 of the Privacy Act 1993 by disclosing the plaintiff’s personal information to the media; and e) breach of the obligation of good faith. (Section 4(A)(b)(iii) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) is relied upon as setting the obligation when it should be s 4 (1)(a)). [9] The remedies sought are: a) permanent reinstatement; b) reimbursement for past earnings,...