Search Results

1. LCRO 75/2016 XN and WN v VO (25 February 2019) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...considered a lawyer’s conduct warrants disciplinary sanction there are two findings that can be made. First, misconduct, the more serious type of conduct, pursuant to s 7 of the Act, and secondly, unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to s 12. Both sections refer to conduct that occurs at a time a lawyer is providing “regulated services”. (i) Misconduct [57] The High Court has drawn the distinction between “professional misconduct (not the statutory term)” on the one hand,...

2. [2021] NZEmpC 138 The 20 District Health Boards v New Zealand Nurses Organisation [pdf, 378 KB]

   THE 20 DISTRICT HEALTH BOARDS (listed in Appendix A) v NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION [2021] NZEmpC 138 [23 August 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 138 EMPC 266/2021 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed in full from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN THE 20 DISTRICT HEALTH BOARDS (listed in Appendix A) Plaintiffs AND NEW ZEALAND NUR

3. LCRO 138/2021 & 139/2021 TZ v FK and FK v TZ (26 July 2022) [pdf, 272 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 084 Ref: LCRO 138 & 139/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [AREA] Standards Committee BETWEEN TZ Applicant in LCRO 138/2021 Respondent in LCRO 139/2021 AND FK Respondent in LCRO 138/2021 Applicant in LCRO 139/2021 DECISION The names and ide...

4. Brown - Kairakau 2C5B (2002) 167 Napier MB 139 (167 NA 139) [pdf, 857 KB]

   Application No: Applicants: Snbject: Sections: Minute Book: 167 NA 139 A20010004983 Angela Ruth Brown and Ivan Rex Brown Rehearing of a paltition application in respect of Palt Kairakau 2C5B block 43/93 and 289/93 DECISION OF THE COURT INTRODUCTION Part Kairakau 2C5B is a 14.5-acre block of Maori land located close to Kairakau Beach in central Hawke's Bay. Pakeha farmers Angela and Rex Brown own 61.64% of the shares; descendants of the original Maori owners own th

5. Gemmell v Gemmell - Mohaka A4 Trust [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 114 (2015 APPEAL 114) [pdf, 456 KB]

   2015 Māori Appellate Court MB 114 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND A20140008837 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mohaka A4 Trust BETWEEN ARTHUR THORPE GEMMELL Appellant AND SAMUEL CARTER (COTTER) GEMMELL Respondent Hearing: 12 November 2014 (Heard at Hastings) Coram Deputy Chief Judge C L Fox (Presiding) Judge S Te A Milroy Judge D J Ambler Appearances: M J...

6. MLC 2018 February Outstanding OCR Applications [pdf, 362 KB]

   ...currently held in the Office of the Chief Registrar in Wellington, are hereby notified, pursuant to rules 3.18, 5.3 and 8.2(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011, as being outstanding and have yet to be determined or set down for inquiry or report under section 46 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. This schedule does not include applications that have been set down for hearing, are before the Court for determination, have been determined by the Court and/or are awaiting release of an...

7. MLC 2018 March Outstanding OCR Applications [pdf, 369 KB]

   ...currently held in the Office of the Chief Registrar in Wellington, are hereby notified, pursuant to rules 3.18, 5.3 and 8.2(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011, as being outstanding and have yet to be determined or set down for inquiry or report under section 46 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. This schedule does not include applications that have been set down for hearing, are before the Court for determination, have been determined by the Court and/or are awaiting release of an...

8. LCRO 1/2018 SY v LT and LN (17 December 2019) [pdf, 224 KB]

   LCRO 001/2018 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN SY Applicant AND LT and LN Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr SY has applied to review a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committe...

9. [2022] NZIACDT 29 - EQ v McCarthy (19 December 2022) [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...agency said it had sought to contact Mr McCarthy numerous times between 23 July and 28 October 2021, but he did not respond. They were given until 11 November 2021 to provide the requested information. The visa officer also requested that three sections of the application be completed. [33] On 18 November 2021, Immigration NZ wrote to Mr McCarthy declining the second expression. There was a lack of mandatory information as to character. [34] On 24 November 2021, the complaina...

10. Toa'fa v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2023] NZACC 116 [pdf, 306 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 116 ACR 245/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JOE TOA’FA Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION First Respondent AND AUCKLAND MEAT PROCESSORS Second Respondent Hearing: 17 July 2023 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: H Armstrong for the A...