Langhorne v ACC [2010] NZACA 4 [pdf, 286 KB]
...employment at age 21. 11 [71] Subsection (2) provides that s.117 has precedence over s.104 if the terms of the claimant’s employment gave an entitlement at subsequent stages to increments in earnings. As Mr Barker noted, Stewart v ACC (128) 1 NZAR 443, is authority for applying s.117 even if the terms of employment do not specify the increments, and that the increments can be estimated. [72] This usually involves the exercise by Mr Shelton, being the application of...