Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 255 Abrahamson v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 290 KB]

   ABRAHAMSON & ORS v CRC IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 255 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an application for declarations under ss 310 and 311 of the Act BETWEEN P S AND P E ABRAHAMSON, CENTRAL PLAINS WATER TRUST, AND CENTRAL PLAINS WATER LIMITED (ENV-2022-CHC-57) Applicants AND CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Hearing

2. 2024] NZEmpC 195 Smalley v Hamilton Hindin Greene Ltd [pdf, 297 KB]

   JAMES SMALLEY v HAMILTON HINDIN GREENE LIMITED [2024] NZEmpC 195 [9 October 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2024] NZEmpC 195 EMPC 188/2024 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for an order that the Employment Relations Authority investigate the matter which is before the Employment Court B

3. Dablo v Tan [2013] NZIACDT 28 (20 May 2013) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...Tan requested a payment of $700, which was paid in cash. After the meeting, Ms Dablo received a request for another payment of $700, which she also paid. She did not receive a receipt or invoice for either payment. Application for work permit (section 35A) [25] Ms Tan submitted an application for a work permit for Ms Dablo on 24 August 2009. This application was to allow her to continue in the low-skilled employment where she was engaged. [26] The application was declined by Immi...

4. Aitken v Laudermilk [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...advisers. It is responsible for the implementation and completion of the development process. It has the power to make all important decisions. Policy demands that the developer owes actionable duties to owners of the buildings it develops. [128] EquusLoco Limited was clearly the developer in this case, while the Laudermilks were the directors of that company. The Laudermilks as occupiers of the house, and as those involved in the planning of the house and changes to the plans, t...

5. LCRO 145/2015 and 148/2015 YK v GS and GS v YK [pdf, 407 KB]

   ...with Mr GS, but that aside, Mr GS identifies no specific criticism of Mr YK’s conduct which is supported by evidence other than his allegations that Mr YK appeared disinterested in his case and had done little for him. Conclusion YK review [128] The Committee imposed a fine of $3,000, this was broken down as $1,000 for the conduct breaches, $1,000 for receiving funds directly from the client and $1,000 for receiving funds in advance and failing to render an invoice. [129] The...

6. LCRO 272/2016 XK v JB (24 June 2019) [pdf, 346 KB]

   ...[127] It is not the role of this Office on review, to conduct a line-by-line audit of invoices, statements, trust account statements and trust account records. This Office does not fulfil the function of a forensic trust accountant. 19 [128] A complainant — whatever the jurisdiction — is obliged to support their claim with evidence to the required standard; in this case, the balance of probabilities. It is not enough for a complainant to provide documents, make allegations...

7. LCRO 193/2017 AA v BB and CC (29 November 2019) [pdf, 153 KB]

   LCRO 193/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN AA Applicant AND BB and CC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr AA has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [x] to take...

8. [2022] NZACC 45 – Williams v ACC (22 March 2022) [pdf, 451 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 45 ACR 66/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MICHAEL WILLIAMS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 2 March 2022 Heard at: Auckland/Tamaki Makaurau via Virtual Meeting Room Appearances: Mr B Hinchcliff for the appellant Mr...

9. [2022] NZACC 19 - McBryde v ACC (9 February 2022) [pdf, 453 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 019 ACR 242/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN PAUL McBRYDE Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 7 December 2021 Heard at: Palmerston North/Te Papaioea Appearances: Mr H Peart for the appellant via AVL Ms F Becroft for the respo...

10. LCRO 131/2022 GN, YL and EK v FQ (30 June 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 061 Ref: LCRO 131/2022 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN GN, YL and EK Applicants AND FQ Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Ms GN, M...