Search Results

1. Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre [2021] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 261 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 066/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN ALISHA MARIE COOK PLAINTIFF AND MANAWATU COMMUNITY LAW CENTRE DEFENDANT AT PALMERSTON NORTH BEFORE: Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member Sir RK Workman KNZM QSO, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms R Oakley for plaintiff Ms N Flint for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 6 July 2020 DATE OF DECISION: 15 February 2021 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 INTRODUCTION [1] Ms Al

2. [2022] NZEnvC 200 Director-General of Conservation v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 662 KB]

   ...provided to the court, I am satisfied that the orders will promote the purpose of the Act so I will make the orders sought. ______________________________ P A Steven Environment Judge fc&L_ 1904165 | 7166547v1 page 1 Appendix 1 Section 1.3 Activities managed by this Plan (Nested Tables) 1.3.1 City-wide activities Transportation Activities Category Activities Sub-Activities Operation, repair and maintenance of the roading network Operation, repair and mai...

3. CORNELIUS Grant Charles (CSU 2011 AUK 001161) [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...police, medical evidence including post mortem and toxicology reports. Both the police, Serious Crash Unit (SCU) and the Department of Labour (DoL), as it was known then, carried out thorough professional and credible investigations. The Law [7] Section 57 of the Coroners Act 2006 sets out the purpose of an inquiry and the legal frame work for an inquest. 57 Purposes of inquiries (1) A coroner opens and conducts an inquiry (including any related inquest) for the 3 purposes...

4. IR v ST LCRO 203 / 2010 (9 March 2012) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...application was filed on 11 August. It did not appear to the Committee that this represented an unduly lengthy period of time between the time of receiving instructions and the time of filing, and I concur with that view. Fees / over charging [128] In his complaint, Mr IR takes exception to the total costs incurred of $59,592.10. He does not consider that these fees are reasonable in order to recover a maximum of 20 $45,000. The essence of his complaint with regard to fe...

5. [2021] NZACC 135–NT v ACC (10 August 2021) [pdf, 285 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 135 ACR 25/14 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NT Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers. Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: The appellant is self-represented H Peart as Amicus Curiae F Becroft for the responden...

6. Beauchamp 30 March 2014 NZSHD 4 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...the same time he was advised, in terms of s.26(1)(a) and (b) of the Act, that he was entitled to request a hearing in person before the Authority, or instead could make written submissions in response to the Complaint. [19] It is noted here that sections 26 and 27 of the Act, although referring specifically to Police ‘Objections’ rather than Police ‘Complaints’, are also applicable to Police ‘Complaints’ by virtue of s.29(2) of the Act. [20] Mr. Beauchamp has chosen to forg...

7. IJ v KL LCRO 190/2016 [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...At the time that the invoice was sent (28 February 2014), Mr IJ had not done a final fees calculation. That occurred in July of that year, when a reconciliation of time revealed double-charging, and the refund was calculated and processed. [128] Mr KL’s final words to the Committee were that he was “even more mystified” (after considering Mr IJ’s various explanations).37 [129] Mr IJ has said that he regarded the $8,000 as being his. Quite apart from the trust account and...

8. LCRO 28/2017 HK v TX (31 May 2019) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...continuing litigation. 18 [127] An issue in dispute was a question as to how much time the parties had spent in negotiations at the Court. This directly impacted the question as to whether Mr TX had provided adequate representation to Ms HK. [128] Mr WZ in correspondence to Mr TX of 31 October 2016, expresses concern that Ms HK and Mr YK had “egregiously” endeavoured to blame Mr TX for their predicament. He tells Mr TX that his former client had blatantly lied in describin...

9. Beatson v CAC 416, Cripsin, Mordaunt & Property Brokers Ltd [2019] NZREADT 25 (9 July 2019) [pdf, 521 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZREADT 25 READT 003/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN BARRY BUSTER BEATSON Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 416) First respondent AND JAMES CRISPIN, TIM MORDAUNT & PROPERTY BROKERS LTD Second respondents Hearing: 15 May 2019 Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Ms

10. [2021] NZACC 44 - Waite v ACC (17 March 2021) [pdf, 261 KB]

    ...ground when he submits that for the role of despatch and receiving clerk the appellant would have upper limb activity for up to 66% of the working day. Dr Xiong points out the difficulty that the appellant would face with repetitive movements. [128] Dr Strack notes that lifting and carrying movements are not typically significant components of this job type. [129] So, on this particular aspect of the role of despatch and receiving clerk the experts appear to differ although Dr...