Search Results

1. 2021-07-07 Transcript (up until 3.25pm of day 42) [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF AND The Resource Management Act 1991 Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 28 June 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environm...

2. VAN DER PASCH Willem Lambertus (CSU 2011 HAM 000424) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...Glenda Harris, the Health and Safety Inspector with the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment formerly Department of Labour. [6] This inquest focussed on the facts leading to the cause of death and the circumstances. The Law [7] Section 57 of the Coroners Act 2006 sets out the purpose of an inquiry and the legal framework for an inquest. 57 Purposes of inquiries (1) A coroner opens and conducts an inquiry (including any related inquest) for the 3 purposes stated...

3. MCINNES John Roderick (CSU 2010 WHG 000188) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...Jurisdiction will carefully examine the circumstances surrounding the individual deaths, but more importantly to focus on what recommendations and comments can be considered in advancing the safety of quad bike use in New Zealand. The Law [10] Section 57 of the Coroners Act 2006 sets out the purpose of an inquiry and the legal frame work for an inquest. 57 Purposes of inquiries (1) A coroner opens and conducts an inquiry (including any related inquest) for the 3 purposes st...

4. Milligan v Robert Brown Developments Ltd [pdf, 133 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00756 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN KAYE BARBARA MILLIGAN Claimant AND ROBERT BROWN DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (Now struck out) First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 19 August 2004 Appearances: Garry Thompson, counsel for the Claimant Stewart Ross in person for the Second Respondent Peter Smith and John Mulholland for the Third Re

5. LCRO 182/2014 DL v SJ, GS and PQ [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...of [the executors of Mr Y’s estate]”.24 [127] It is difficult to precisely identify the various r 5 breaches by Mr DL that the Committee had in mind. Its decision refers simply to giving advice against the interests of Mr Y’s estate. [128] It may be that the Committee considered that Mr DL was not “independent” when he, whilst his firm acted in the administration of Mr Y’s estate, gave advice against that client’s interests to Mr and Mrs SJ.

6. LCRO 16/2020 PF v VJ (22 September 2020) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...his office for most of 19, and 20 September. He said he had forwarded Ms FB’s letter to DEF for instructions, and would “likely revert by close of business” on Monday, 23 September. On 23 September Mr VJ sent his response to Ms FB. [128] As noted in the decision referred to above, it is reasonable to expect that a lawyer, upon receipt of a colleague’s written communication that calls for a response, would within a reasonable time inform the colleague if unable to respond...

7. Pratt v General Distributors Limited [2025] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 337 KB]

   1 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] Mr Pratt suffered traumatic brain injuries (TBI) in 1994 and in 2002. Among other things, those injuries result in his balance being impaired, which affects how he walks and at times his speech can be slurred. Much to Mr Pratt’s frustration, others sometimes wrongly conclude that his unsteadiness on his feet and his slurred words indicate he is 1 This decision is to be cited as Pratt v General Distributors Limited [2025] NZHRRT 5. IN THE HUMA

8. Matthews v Matthews - Estate of Graham Ngahina Matthews (2010) 253 Aotea MB 250 (253 AOT 250) [pdf, 200 KB]

   MATTHEWS V MATTHEWS MLC A20080010445 2 August 2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 253 AOTEA MB 250 (253 AOT 250) A20080010445 UNDER Section 164, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Graham Ngahina Matthews BETWEEN GRAHAM NGAHINA MATTHEWS Applicant AND GEORGE MATTHEWS LESLEY PIDDLE SHEREE COMRIE Respondents Hearings: 220 Aotea MB 72, 18 November 2008 225 Aotea MB 74, 24 February 2009 229 Aotea MB 76, 21 April 2009 230 Aotea MB 205,...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 037 Hensman v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 461 KB]

   ...for a vehicle crossing to proposed Lot 3, although resource consent was not required under any of the land use rules. [7] The accessway within Lot 3 is depicted on the application plans with information pertaining to contours, long and cross-sections and sightlines pertaining to the location of the vehicle crossing. The information records that the accessway was compliant with the district plan rules. [8] Plans approved with the subdivision consent depict the location of the ve...

10. Waitangi Tribunal - Mangatū Remedies Report [pdf, 3.8 MB]

    T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 3 W A I 8 1 4 T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E