Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 203 Director General of Conservation v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 7.8 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Mt Messenger IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND AND AND AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 2 0 3 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of six appeals under s 120 and/or s 17 4 of the Act for Mount Messenger Bypass proposed State Highway 3 between Uruti and Ahititi, North Taranaki DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2019-WLG-000003) (ENV-2019-WLG-000004) TE RONANGA O NGATI TAMA TRUST (ENV-2019-WL

2. INZ (Calder) v Shearer [2019] NZIACDT 41 (19 June 2019) [pdf, 286 KB]

   IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2019] NZIACDT 41 Reference No: IACDT 030/17 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN IMMIGRATION NEW ZEALAND (DARREN CALDER) Complainant AND MARIA CHARINA (CHARIE) SHEARER Adviser SUBJECT TO SU

3. [2021] NZEmpC 35 Radford v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 415 KB]

   MISHELE RADFORD v CHIEF OF NEW ZEALAND DEFENCE FORCE [2021] NZEmpC 35 [24 March 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 35 EMPC 396/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a referral of a question of law from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MISHELE RADFORD Plaintiff AND CHIEF OF NEW ZEALAND DEFENCE FORCE Defendant AND MINISTRY OF FOREIGN

4. LCRO 87/2018 QZ v FZB (20 December 2019) [pdf, 231 KB]

   LCRO 87/2018 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN QZ Applicant AND FZB Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr QZ, a lawyer, and at the relevant time the principal of his own firm, KWU (the firm), has applied fo...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 120 Brookby Quarries Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI T AIAO KITAMAKIMAKAURAU IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND AND Decision [2021] NZEnvC 1'2-0 an appeal under s 156(1) of the Local Government Act (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) BROOKBY QUARRIES LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-150) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent ROYAL FOREST & BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE S

6. [2022] NZACC 8 – N v ACC (20 January 2022) [pdf, 303 KB]

   PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 008 ACR 037/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN N Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION C

7. Grace – Ngarara West A25B2A (2014) 317 Aotea MB 268 (317 AOT 268) [pdf, 254 KB]

   IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 317 Aotea MB 268 (317 AOT 268) A20130004173 A20130011082 UNDER Section 338 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF NGARARA WEST A25B2A BETWEEN PATRICIA FRANCES GRACE Applicant AND NGARARA WEST A25B2 AHU WHENUA TRUST Applicant AND NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Interested Party AND VECTOR GAS LTD Interested Party Hearing: 22 No

8. Appendix One to Cabinet Paper Reforming the Privacy Act 1993 [pdf, 378 KB]

   Appendix One: Less substantive recommendations Part A: Recommendations to be implemented Law Commission recommendations # Recommendation Discussion and impacts 3 The Privacy Act should have a purpose section, with specific clauses as drafted by the Law Commission Agree the new Act should have a new purpose section. Final wording (agreed during drafting) will build upon the Law Commission’s suggestions and focus on balancing privacy interests with important social and busi

9. Doria v Diamond Laser Medispa Taupo Limited & Ors [2025] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 335 KB]

   1 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as Doria v Diamond Laser Medispa Taupo Limited & Ors [2025] NZHRRT 12. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2025] NZHRRT 12 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 014/2018 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN ZELINDA DORIA PLAINTIFF AND DIAMOND LASER MEDISPA TAUPO LIMITED FIRST DEFENDANT AND OLIVIA JANE BLAKENEY-WILLIAMS SECOND DEFENDANT AND RICHARD HUGH BLAKENEY-WILLIAMS THIR

10. BORA Armed Forces Law Reform Bill [pdf, 557 KB]

    Armed Forces Law Reform Bill 23 February 2007 Attorney-General LEGAL ADVICE CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990: ARMED FORCES LAW REFORM BILL 1. Further to our letter of 13 February 2007, indicating that no provision in the Armed Forces Law Reform Bill (PCO 6759/13) (the "Bill") appeared to be inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the "Bill of Rights Act"), we now provide detailed advice on a number of proposals in the