Search Results

1. 2021-03-11 ORC PC7 - Transcript (up to end of day 2 - 9 March 2021) [pdf, 1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Courtroom MERK 017 Court: Env

2. 2021-03-11 Transcript of 8-9 March 2021 - E&OE - not complete [pdf, 1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Judge J E Bort

3. Recommendations recap - issue 14 [pdf, 891 KB]

   ...formal reference is intended. Please also note that summaries of circumstances and recommendations following self-inflicted deaths may be edited so as to comply with restrictions on publication of particulars of those deaths, as detailed in section 71 of the Coroners Act 2006. Similarly, the contents of summaries and recommendations may be edited to comply with any orders made under section 74 of the Act. We would like to thank Professor Edwin Mitchell of the University of Auc...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 136 The Canyon Vineyard Ltd v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 507 KB]

   ...that: • the building platform on Lot 10 is depicted 12 m east of its previously illustrated location; and • the building platform on Lot 11 is depicted 16 m east and 6.5 m south of the previously illustrated location. [55] Further cross-sections and viewshafts were also included in that affidavit. [56] Three viewpoint locations were depicted on these plans. These locations were considered to represent the worst-case scenario in terms of visibility from the Canyon site, due...

5. Le Lievre v Muriwhenua Incorporation - Muriwhenua Incorporation (2016) 123 Taitokerau MB 240 (123 TTK 240) [pdf, 303 KB]

   123 Taitokerau MB 240 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20120013565 UNDER Sections 18(1)(a), (b), (c) and (d), 19(1)(a) and (b), 20(d), 22A and 24A Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Muriwhenua Incorporation BETWEEN RONDA LE LIEVRE Applicant AND MURIWHENUA INCORPORATION First Respondent AND MARY BRATTON Second Respondent Hearing: 3 July 2013 25 September 2014 19 and 20 Feb

6. Youth Court - Signed, sealed – (but not yet fully) delivered [pdf, 817 KB]

   1 “Signed, Sealed – (but not yet fully) Delivered” An analysis of the “revolutionary” 1989 legislative blueprint to address youth offending in New Zealand, particularly by young Māori, and a discussion as to the extent to which it has been fully realised. Paper to be delivered at the “Healing Courts, Healing Plans, Healing People: International Indigenous Therapeutic Jurisprudence Conference” by His Honour Judge Andrew Becroft1

7. [2020] NZEnvC 024 Panuku Developments Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Counsel: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 02-4- of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000176) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent R Peters and R Bannan R Dexter and A Modrow N Smith P Lange L Whiley s 27 4 parties Envir

8. LCRO 28/2021 RW v BD and Law Firm A (3 May 2022) [pdf, 330 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 25 Ref: LCRO 28/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of [Area] Standards Committee X BETWEEN RW Applicant AND BD and [LAW FIRM A] Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr RW has

9. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - 5th report [pdf, 386 KB]

   ................................................................................................. 5 - 9 8 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 ............................................. 10 - 12 10 Judicial Opinion on Incompatibility ................................................ 13 - 16 11 Section 6 of the Bill of Rights Act ................................................... 17 - 19 11 Section 7 of the Bill of Rights Act ......................................................

10. Yates v Te Kohanga Trust - Te Kohanga Lots 1, 3-16, 24 and 27 (2013) 63 Taitokerau MB 299 (63 TTK 299) [pdf, 224 KB]

    63 Taitokerau MB 299 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20090009342 UNDER Sections 19(1)(a) and 20 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Kohanga Lots 1, 3-16, 24 and 27 BETWEEN CARLA YATES Applicant AND TE KOHANGA LOTS 1, 3-16, 24 and 27 TRUST Respondent Hearing: 16 June 2009 19 June 2009 23 July 2009 21 February 2012 (Heard at Kaikohe, Kaitaia and Whangārei) Appearances: Mr B McGregor for Ms Yat