Search Results

1. Family violence reform paper 2: Family violence civil law [pdf, 586 KB]

   1 Budget sensitive In confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Chair Cabinet Social Policy Committee REFORM OF FAMILY VIOLENCE LAW Paper Two: Family violence civil law Proposal 1. This paper is the second of three papers seeking Cabinet agreement to reforms to the law applying to family violence, following the review of family violence legislation. It seeks agreement to changes to the civil law relating to family violence, in particular the Domestic Violence Act

2. FV Reform Paper 2 Civil Law [pdf, 558 KB]

   1 Budget sensitive In confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Chair Cabinet Social Policy Committee REFORM OF FAMILY VIOLENCE LAW Paper Two: Family violence civil law Proposal 1. This paper is the second of three papers seeking Cabinet agreement to reforms to the law applying to family violence, following the review of family violence legislation. It seeks agreement to changes to the civil law relating to family violence, in particular the Domestic Violence Act

3. Annexure 7 - Decisions on Submissions [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   447585.29#5586804v1 1 We have taken Mr De Pelsemaeker’s equivalent table as our template and where we deviate from him we have tracked changed our decision. 2 Public Health South filed a memorandum dated 10 December 2020 indicating its wish to withdraw from the proceedings. However, it is not clear whether it intended to withdraw its submission or simply not to appear in support, and so we have considered the submission. 3 The court has recorded a ‘reject’ decision in relation

4. 2022-03-18 ORC - Opening Submissions [pdf, 373 KB]

   ...UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Omnibus Plan Change - Plan Change 8, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant LEGAL SUBMISSIONS OF COUNSEL FOR THE OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL PC8 - URBAN SECTOR PROVISI...

5. 2020 Cannabis Referendum Public Release 27 April 2021 [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   IN-CONFIDENCE 1 In Confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Chair, Cabinet Business Committee 2020 Cannabis referendum: Exposure draft Bill and Summary of policies for public release Proposal 1. The decision on whether or not to legalise and regulate cannabis for personal use is an important one that has implications for New Zealand as a society, and for our communities. The Government is committed to a well-informed cannabis referendum, to ensure a definitive r

6. Cabinet paper - Summary of policies Cabinet minutes - Exposure draft Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill [pdf, 6 MB]

   IN-CONFIDENCE 1 In Confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Chair, Cabinet Business Committee 2020 Cannabis referendum: Exposure draft Bill and Summary of policies for public release Proposal 1. The decision on whether or not to legalise and regulate cannabis for personal use is an important one that has implications for New Zealand as a society, and for our communities. The Government is committed to a well-informed cannabis referendum, to ensure a definitive r

7. O'Connell & Anor v Auckland Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 7 [pdf, 294 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2012-100-000017 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 7 BETWEEN PATRICK AND LESLEE O’CONNELL Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND CEDRIC DUDLEY FRENCH Second Respondent AND ROBERT PETER JOSEPH TOEBOSCH Third Respondent Hearing: 27 and 28 November 2012 Closing Written Submissions: 12 December 2012 – claimants first and second respondents 14 December 2012- Mr Toebosch, third respondent Closing Oral

8. Lowe and Ors as Trustees of the Vivienne Hicks Family Trust v Morrison [2011] NZWHT Auckland 27 [pdf, 263 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000036 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 27 BETWEEN VIVIENNE DIANA LOWE, GRAHAM BRENTLEIGH BOND and LORRAINE LILA BARTLEY as Trustees of the VIVIENNE HICKS FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND ROGER MORRISON First Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Second Respondent AND STUART SAVILL (KERIAN SAVILL removed) Third Respondents AND MAJORIE and ROBERT JANSEN Fourth Respondents AND PLASTER SYSTEMS LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND MA

9. [2021] NZEmpC 139 QDA v EKD [pdf, 336 KB]

   ...on an interim basis until now. [127] Mr Williams noted that Mr D is 62 years of age. He holds, and has held, a number of low wage jobs. He is currently employed in seasonal work, although he aims to seek stable and better paid employment. [128] QDA neither consents to, nor opposes, the making of a permanent order. [129] Whilst no clear diagnosis exists, it is clear there are a number of interpersonal issues as already discussed. In a report obtained after the cessation of Mr D...

10. [2021] NZREADT 52 - QH v KE, SE & Agency (14 October 2021) [pdf, 299 KB]

    ...blocks, not houses. At the very least, this should have put him on notice to check the zoning information obtained from the advertisement. [127] Then there are the numerous occasions QH was notified of the need to undertake due diligence. [128] The evidence of KE and SE that they verbally told QH to do his own due diligence is not disputed. This advice was reinforced by the formal documents he signed. The Purchaser Acknowledgments signed by QH on 1 October 2020 stated that th...