Search Results

Search results for section 128.

2517 items matching your search terms

Search Employment Court only.

  1. LCRO 74/2020 NS v AD (29 January 2021) [pdf, 285 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 014 Ref: LCRO 74/2020 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN NS Applicant AND AD Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Mr NS has ap...

  2. LCRO 240/2016 HM v NL (28 November 2018) [pdf, 255 KB]

    LCRO 240/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN HM Applicant AND NL Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr HM has applied to review a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X], in which the Comm

  3. LCRO 104/2019 RY v DN (1 May 2020) [pdf, 273 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2020] NZLCRO 55 Ref: LCRO 104/2019 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN RY Applicant AND DN Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms RY has...

  4. LCRO 42/2021 JKL Limited v HC and GD (30 August 2021) [pdf, 277 KB]

    ...have contributed to those issues. [127] Whilst that objective may be laudable, it is only as effective as a service provider’s acknowledgement of an issue in the first place. Absent that acknowledgment, JKL’s concerns become speculative. [128] On that account, there are again differing versions of what was said by Mr MT during the 27 July 2020 meeting. Or, more accurately, differing accounts about Mr MT’s demeanour when talking about the long hours put in dealing with the co...

  5. [2024] NZEnvC 156 New Zealand Steel Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 830 KB]

    NZ Steel Ltd v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 156 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND STEEL LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-000042) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Alternate Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case event: Joint memorandum and amended consent memorandum date

  6. [2025] NZEmpC 161 Chief of Defence Force v YFX [pdf, 311 KB]

    THE CHIEF OF THE NEW ZEALAND DEFENCE FORCE v YFX [2025] NZEmpC 161 [1 August 2025] ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE DEFENDANT IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZEmpC 161 EMPC 103/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN THE CHIEF OF THE NEW ZEALAND DEFENCE FORCE

  7. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Tauranga Moana [pdf, 13 MB]

    T   A   U    R    A     N    G     A  M   O  A     N     A 1  8  8  6    –    2  0  0  6 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W  A  I  T A  N    G 

  8. February-2021-draft-Notification-of-Applications-in-Office-of-Chief-Registrar.pdf [pdf, 559 KB]

    ...currently held in the Office of the Chief Registrar in Wellington, are hereby notified, pursuant to rules 3.18, 5.3 and 8.2(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011, as being outstanding and have yet to be determined or set down for inquiry or report under section 46 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. This schedule does not include applications that have been set down for hearing, are before the Court for determination, have been determined by the Court and/or are awaiting release of any...

  9. Outstanding applications in the office of the chief registrar [pdf, 567 KB]

    ...currently held in the Office of the Chief Registrar in Wellington, are hereby notified, pursuant to rules 3.18, 5.3 and 8.2(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011, as being outstanding and have yet to be determined or set down for inquiry or report under section 46 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. This schedule does not include applications that have been set down for hearing, are before the Court for determination, have been determined by the Court and/or are awaiting release of any...

  10. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Privacy Act) [2020] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 353 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 13 Reference No. HRRT 015/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN EAMON HENNING MARSHALL PLAINTIFF AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GW Marshall as agent for his son Ms I Reuvecamp for defe