Search Results

1. Protection Order applications December 2017 [xlsx, 262 KB]

   Contents Protection Order applications Protection Order application data is extracted from a live dataset that is used for operational purposes.  This means that data will be updated through late data entry and active applications progressing through the court process. Therefore, this data may differ to data reported elsewhere with a different extraction date. These tables were extracted on 12 March 2018. Contents: Table 1: Number of Protection Order applications, by app

2. 29.-Evidence-of-Ms-Ainsley-McLeod-Conditions.pdf [pdf, 563 KB]

   Barristers and Solicitors Wellington Solicitor Acting: David Allen / Thaddeus Ryan Email: david.allen@buddlefindlay.com / thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64 4 044 620450 Fax 64 4 499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6011 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for res

3. Trustees of the Rowallan Block XIII Secs 1 and 5 Ahu Whenua Trusts v Orbell - Rowallan Block XIII Secs 1 and 5 Ahu Whenua Trusts (2015) 28 Te Waipounamu MB 37 (28 TWP 37) [pdf, 358 KB]

   28 Te Waipounamu MB 37 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT A20130003080 UNDER Sections 237 and 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 and Sections 72 and 73, Trustee Act 1956 IN THE MATTER OF Rowallan Block XIII Secs 1 and 5 Ahu Whenua Trusts BETWEEN CATHERINE MARKS, ROBERT WILLIS and ANDREW McPHERSON as Trustees of the Rowallan Block XIII Secs 1 and 5 Ahu Whenua Trusts Applicants AND

4. Pilbrow & Anor as Trustees of the Pilbrow Family Trust v Moorhead [2011] NZWHT Auckland 31 [pdf, 352 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000059 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 31 BETWEEN OWEN IVOR MAUL PILBROW and JOAN GWENDOLINE PILBROW as Trustees of the PILBROW FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND HUGH CHARLES MOORHEAD and BARBARA MARY MOORHEAD First Respondents AND CRAVEN BUILDERS LIMITED Second Respondent AND EUROPLAST FINISHES LIMITED Third Respondent AND LANCE CLARK Fourth Respondent AND DAVID TAYLOR Fifth Respondent AND GIANNI MA

5. Director of Proceedings v Brooks (Application for Final Non-Publication Orders) [2019] NZHRRT 33 [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   (1) PERMANENT ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 33 UNDER BETWEEN AND AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms K Anderson, Member Ms W Gilchrist, Member REPRESENTATION: Reference No. HRRT 093/2016 SECTION 50 OF THE HEAL TH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF WILLIAM ARTHUR BROOKS DEFENDANT Ms V Cas

6. [2022] NZEmpC 118 New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association v Board of Trustees for Rodney College [pdf, 519 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND POST PRIMARY TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION v BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR RODNEY COLLEGE [2022] NZEmpC 118 [4 July 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 118 EMPC 49/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND POST PRIMARY TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION Plaintiff AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR R

7. [2023] NZEmpC 89 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant [pdf, 787 KB]

   ...evening hours. He also was entitled to a day off in lieu. Additionally, Mr Ram worked his ordinary hours on 1 and 2 January 2018 for which he was entitled to be paid at time and a half. He also was entitled to two days off in lieu as a result. [128] Mr Ram left for India on 1 February 2018. His bank account records indicate he did not work on 30 and 31 January 2018, when it seems he was in Auckland. However, I find that he worked his normal hours on Monday, 29 January 2018, wh...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 117 Hutchison v Nelson City Council re-issued [pdf, 222 KB]

   ROBYN ANN HUTCHISON v NELSON CITY COUNCIL NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 117 CRC 9/13 [9 July 2014, re-issued on 11 November 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 117 CRC 9/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ROBYN ANN HUTCHISON Plaintiff AND NELSON CITY COUNCIL Defendant Hearing: 9, 10 and 11 June 2014 (heard at Nelson) Appearanc

9. LCRO 95/2019 CM v DL (9 March 2021) [pdf, 285 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 31 Ref: LCRO 95/2019 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN CM Applicant AND DL Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr CM has ap...

10. Chapman v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 364 KB]

    ............................. 14 Head flashings lacked stop-ending, particularly on raking windows ................... 15 Lack of adequate jamb seals behind joinery facings .......................................... 16 Exposed cove sealants at window jamb sections ............................................... 16 No form of sill flashings were utilised .................................................................. 17 Improper reliance on sealants at critical junctions where the seal...