Search Results

1. Abortion Legislation Bill (Cabinet Papers) [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...regulation of access to, and oversight of, abortion services. For these matters, options have been assessed against criteria and objectives that support a ‘health approach’. 127. The Panel considers that this structure is sound. Human Rights 128. Moving to a health approach is more consistent with our international human rights obligations. International human rights bodies consider abortion as a matter of sexual and reproductive health and that it should not be criminalised. 12...

2. LCRO 196/2020 AB v CD (31 March 2021) [pdf, 309 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 044 Ref: LCRO 196/2020 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN AB Applicant AND CD Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Ms AB has a...

3. LCRO 35/2024 UX v RT (19 September 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 117 Ref: LCRO 35/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN UX1 Applicant AND RT Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant,

4. Holden & Anor as Trustees of the Estate of Bruce Morris v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 23 [pdf, 432 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-101-000109 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 23 BETWEEN ALISTER HOLDEN AND MURRAY BRIDGE AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF BRUCE MORRIS Claimants AND PETER HANNS TRADING AS HANNS BUILDERS & JOINERS First Respondent AND ROGER WALKER ARCHITECTS LTD Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND DION BARETA (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND K ROAD NO 1 LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND STOANZ LIMITED (Remo

5. Applicant's Revised Conditions 24 August 2018 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...appropriate reporting to assist the Council with compliance monitoring; and (e) Take such actions as necessary to resolve any matters arising from the implementation of the conditions. Commencement & Duration of Consents 4. Pursuant to sections 116 and 123 of the RMA, the commencement and duration for the various resource consents shall be as set out in the table below: Consent Duration (unless the consent has lapsed, been surrendered, or been cancelled at an earlier time)...

6. [2016] NZEmpC 95 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...necessary for prosecuting the claim had come into existence by 3 March 2008. b) Because it was possible that liability for a bonus payment would not crystallise until the joint venture project concluded, the bonus claim was not time-barred. c) Section 11B(2) was a potentially applicable provision of the MW Act; Mr Pretorius was not time-barred from pursuing a claim under that 1 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [2015] N...

7. LCRO 172/2015 and 173/2015 WL v XC and HF v XC (16 May 2019) [pdf, 269 KB]

   LCRO 172/2015 173/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN WL Applicant AND XC Respondent AND BETWEEN HF Applicant AND XC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms WL and Mr HF have

8. [2019] NZEmpC 98 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [pdf, 565 KB]

   ROBERT NOBLE v BALLOONING CANTERBURY.COM LIMITED [2019] NZEmpC 98 [19 August 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 98 EMPC 85/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ROBERT NOBLE Plaintiff AND BALLOONING CANTERBURY.COM LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 15 and 16 April 2019 (Heard in Ch

9. [2023] NZREADT 17 - UM v REAA (26 July 2023) [pdf, 250 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZREADT 17 Reference No: READT 017/2022 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN UM Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2103) First Respondent AND NED GOW Second Respondent AND SU Third Respondent Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) G J Denley (Member) P N O’Connor (Member) Representation: The

10. [2024] NZACC 141 NF v ACC (Impairment Assessment, Independence Allowance) (21 August 2024) [pdf, 357 KB]

    NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF APPELLANT PROHIBITED BY S 160 (1), (2) AND (3) OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001. SEE https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2001/0049/latest/DLM101854.html IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 141 ACAR 041/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NF Appe