Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 222 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd [pdf, 311 KB]

   HAIG DAVID CHARLES FLASHOFF v NEW ZEALAND TECHNOLOGY GROUP HAWKES BAY LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 222 [9 December 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2020] NZEmpC 222 EMPC 319/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN HAIG DAVID CHARLES FLASHOFF First Plaintiff AND DONALD PETER PRICE Second Plaintiff AND RAYMON

2. LCRO 133/2017 AD v BE (18 September 2019) [pdf, 349 KB]

   LCRO 133/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN AD Applicant AND BE Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr AD has applied to review a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] in which the Committee mad...

3. Beauchamp v B & T Co (2011) Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...because she was pregnant. [110] The Tribunal has also found that Ms Beauchamp has failed to establish on the balance of probabilities that the defendants subjected her to detriments during her employment because of her pregnancy in breach of that section. [111] Having found that Ms Beauchamp has established that the defendants breached HRA, s 22(1)(c), we now turn to assess remedy. REMEDY ASSESSMENT Declaration [112] We have found that the defendants dismissed Ms Beauchamp beca...

4. LCRO 94/2023 GW v MA (30 June 2025) [pdf, 321 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 096 Ref: LCRO 94/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN GW Applicant AND MA Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr GW has applied fo...

5. Baker v Paora - Te Tii Waitangi B3 (2015) 113 Taitokerau MB 31 (113 TTK 31) [pdf, 1 MB]

   113 Taitokerau MB 31 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20090015424 A20100004537 UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii Waitangi B3 BETWEEN MARYANNE BAKER Applicant A20150002058 UNDER Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 AND BETWEEN WAIRETI PAORA Applicant Hearing: 20 August 2015 (Heard at Kaik

6. Smitheram v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 24 [pdf, 483 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101- 000048 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 24 BETWEEN VIVIENNE SMITHERAM AND BERNARD MCBRIDE Claimants AND PETER HANNS TRADING AS HANNS BUILDERS & JOINERS First Respondent AND ROGER WALKER ARCHITECTS LTD Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND DION BARETA (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND K ROAD NO 1 LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND STOANZ LIMITED (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND HANNA

7. CBA v LKJ Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 205 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANT AND EMPLOYEES OF THE DEFENDANT (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 13 Reference No. HRRT 034/2011 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN CBA PLAINTIFF AND LKJ LIMITED DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr R

8. AB v CD LCRO 228/2014 (27 October 2016) [pdf, 343 KB]

   LCRO 228/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN AB Applicant AND CD Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Mr AB has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee which, followin...

9. Tangi v ACC [2012] NZACA 4 [pdf, 119 KB]

   [2012] NZACA 4 (ACA 004/09) IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN TANIELA TANGI of Auckland Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Auckland on 9 December 2011 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Mr H

10. LCRO 156/2016 KZ v XL on behalf of [Company A] (18 January 2019) [pdf, 320 KB]

    LCRO 156/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN KZ Applicant AND XL on behalf of [Company A] Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms KZ has applied to review a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (th