SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 8 [23 February 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 8 ARC 98/13 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Defendant
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER OF Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 51 appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RANGITANE O TAMAI<.I NUI A RUA INCORPORATED AND AND (ENV-2018-WLG-000034) TARARUA COUNCIL DISTRICT (ENV-2018-WLG-000035) Appellants IvlANA WATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Envir
RAVENSWOOD DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v WAIMAKARIRI DISTRICT COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 7 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under Clause 29 of Schedule 1 of the Act on Private Plan Change 30 to the Waimakariri District Plan BETWEEN RAVENSWOOD DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2022-CHC-001) Appellant AND WAIMAKARIRI DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 205 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act JOHN COSSENS (ENV-2017 -CHC-079) Appellant QUEENSTOWN-LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: at Queenstown on 1 and 2 August 2018 Final submissions received 12 September 2018 Appearance
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 060 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14(1) of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 against a decision on Proposed Plan Change 21 to the Auckland Unitary Plan BETWEEN EDEN-EPSOM RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2020-AKL-079) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND SOUTHERN CROSS HOSPITALS LIMITED Requestor AND KAINGA
WAIMARINO QUEENSTOWN LTD (AS SUCCESSOR TO B PROPERTY GROUP LTD) v QLDC IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 293 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN WAIMARINO QUEENSTOWN LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO B PROPERTY GROUP LIMITED) (ENV-2023-CHC-1) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environm
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 7 May 2024 Ref: OIA 110821 Tēnā koe Mr Official Information Act request: Alcohol regulations Thank you for your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) on 21 March 2024 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry). Specifically, you requested: Could you please provide a copy of the 2022 report to the Ministe
Section 87F Report – Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project (Ō2NL Project) Prepared by Logan Brown – Water Quality and Aquatic Ecology 1 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of applications by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi) to Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council for resource consents to enable the construction, operation and maintenance of new state highway, s
Contents Protection Order applications Protection Order application data is extracted from a live dataset that is used for operational purposes, meaning the data will be updated with late data entry and active applications progressing through the court process. Therefore, this data may differ to data reported elsewhere with a different extraction date. These tables were extracted on 11 March 2019 Contents: Table 1a: Number and percentage of Protection Order applications, by
...Conclusion on the alternative defence [110] THE QUESTION WHETHER THE REQUESTS WERE VEXATIOUS [112] Outline of the case for the Crown [128] Outline of the case for Mr Dotcom [131] The evidence of Mr Dotcom [132] Credibility assessment [140] SECTION 29(1)(j) – INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION [145] Meaning of “vexatious” [146] “Vexatious” and the broader context of the Privacy Act [147] Vexatiousness and the context of the Dotcom case – the importance of maintaining pers...