REPORT FOR THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE ON COMPENSATION CLAIM BY DAVID CULLEN BAIN BY HON IAN BINNIE QC 30 August 2012 ‐ ii ‐ Table of Contents MANDATE AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvcj_Q5 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under s 120 of the Act D G SCHMUCK (ENV-2018-AKL-351) Appellant NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith, presiding Commissioner R M Bartlett Commissioner I S Buchanan Hearing: 9-12 April 2019 at Whangarei plus site visit Appearances: C H Prendergast for D G Schmuck (Mr Sc
...either: (a) the damming of water; or (b) the storage of hazardous substances, for the purpose of establishing a tailings dam, the consent authority will require the person erecting the dam to plan for and provide measures, including bonds under Section 108 of the Resource Management Act, for the complete remediation of any loss or damage caused by the uncontrolled release of contaminants. There is a risk of such releases where the tailings dam constructed to store the contaminan...
...either: (a) the damming of water; or (b) the storage of hazardous substances, for the purpose of establishing a tailings dam, the consent authority will require the person erecting the dam to plan for and provide measures, including bonds under Section 108 of the Resource Management Act, for the complete remediation of any loss or damage caused by the uncontrolled release of contaminants. There is a risk of such releases where the tailings dam constructed to store the contaminan...
...either: (a) the damming of water; or (b) the storage of hazardous substances, for the purpose of establishing a tailings dam, the consent authority will require the person erecting the dam to plan for and provide measures, including bonds under Section 108 of the Resource Management Act, for the complete remediation of any loss or damage caused by the uncontrolled release of contaminants. There is a risk of such releases where the tailings dam constructed to store the contaminan...
Section 87F Report – Ōtaki to North of Levin Highway Project (Ō2NL Project) Prepared by James Lambie – Terrestrial Ecology 1 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of applications by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi) to Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council for resource consents to enable the construction, operation and maintenance of new state highway, shared use pat
Distr. GENERAL CCPR/C/64/Add.10 30 May 1994 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT Third periodic reports of States parties due in 1990 Addendum NEW ZEALAND* [1 April 1994] CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 10 2 II. INFORMATION IN RELATION TO SPECIFIC ARTICLES . . . . 11 - 144 5 III. TOKELAU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 - 159 36
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 187 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act HAWKE'S BAY FISH AND GAME COUNCIL (ENV-2013-WLG-OS4) Appellant HAWKE'S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court : Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner I M Buchanan Hearing : at Hastings on 11 and 12 September 2017 Appearances: M A Baker-
...[Firm]’s approach to acting for and taking instructions from Mr LS and Mrs HS, is unremarkable. That being said, it appears that neither was provided with a letter and/or terms of engagement, when the retainers began in September/October 2011. [128] Mr DV could not recall whether he provided that information to Mr LS and Mrs HS, and could not recall seeing documents of that nature on [Firm]’ files. Neither Mr LS nor Mrs HS could recall receiving this information at the beginning...
...having “taken independent legal advice”, the beneficiaries had provided their consent before the application was filed, but says that “proved impossible in the circumstances”. He says he had “referred” them for independent advice.40 [128] He says consistent with his advice to Mr QSR, because the 2013 will, which he says he had not discussed with Mr ASR before Mr ASR’s death, “recorded” Mr ASR’s “most recent and up-to-date wishes”, he “was required to obse...