104 Taitokerau MB 108 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130001203 A20130001204 A20130001205 A20130001206 UNDER Section 315(1)(c), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Whakataha Z1C Paparimurimu B Paparimurimu A3 Part Tapapanui B4D2 BETWEEN TOP ENERGY LIMITED Applicant Hearing: 26 June 2013 21 February 2014 (Heard at Kaikohe) Judgment: 08 June 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF...
31557164:629148 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a Notice of Motion under Section 87G requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish a Marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf BETWEEN WAIHEKE MARINAS LIMITED Lodgment: ENV-2013-AKL-000174 Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent OPENING SUBMISSIONS FOR THE AUCK
...August 2019 Date of Issue: 16 August 2019 Burgoyne v Northland Regional Council 2 SECOND DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: The consent conditions are confirmed as annexed hereto and marked A subject to the following amendments: (a) Section 3.4.3.2 penultimate paragraph will now provide that at least one survey must be conducted every five years. Repeat surveys between this time shall occur as follows: (i) once after the initial vegetation survey (to provide an accurate...
...in Tuwharetoa Maori Trust Board v Waikato Regional Council. 21 We think that he might have missed a central point of that decision by focusing solely on whether the Court could resolve a dispute about mana whenua status. The whole of paragraph [128] of that decision should be read to understand what was really being examined: [128] We acknowledge the difficulties arising from disputes as to mana whenua . We agree that it was not the Commissioners' task to resolve "mana whe...
360 Aotea MB 127 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20160002211 A20160002212 UNDER Sections 239 and 244 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Komene 4A2 and other blocks BETWEEN TERENCE TE REI HIKAKA AND KEREN HIKAKA Applicants AND RAUNA NGAWHARE Respondent Hearings: 355 Aotea MB 81-96 dated 14 June 2016
...visa expires in June 2021. At this stage, if Mr Maradiya is required to return to India, it is unlikely that he would be able to gain entry permission into New Zealand for the hearing. [4] The plaintiffs do not oppose this application. [5] Section 5 of the Courts (Remote Participation) Act provides criteria to apply when such an application is made. That criteria includes the nature of the proceeding, the availability and quality of the technology that would be used, the poten...
...Asparaona Ltd [2019] NZERA 215 (Member Campbell). [2] The plaintiff has applied for an order allowing one of his witnesses to give evidence remotely by audio-visual link (AVL), pursuant to the Courts (Remote Participation) Act 2010. [3] Section 5 of that Act provides criteria to apply when such an application is made. Those criteria include the nature of the proceeding, the availability and quality of the technology that would be used, the potential impact of the use of the...
...evidence that he would have lost at least three months’ remuneration as a result of 3 Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd [2011] NZEmpC 160 at [47]. his dismissal, the Court is required under s 128(2) of the Act to reimburse Mr Pickering for the income lost over that three-month (or 13-week) period. [66] Under s 128(3) of the Act the Court also has a discretion to order an employer to pay a greater sum as compensation for lost...
...of the Act so I will make the orders sought. ______________________________ K G Reid Environment Judge AUTH-20222055-01 Environment Southland is the brand name of the Southland Regional Council Discharge Permit Under Section 104B of the Resource Management Act 1991, a resource consent is granted by the Southland Regional Council to Capil Grove Limited of 27 Capil Road, RD 2, Invercargill 9872 from Date Consent Granted. Please read this Consent carefully,...
Court of Trial Protocol Established by the Chief High Court Judge and the Chief District Court Judge for Category 2 and 3 Offences Pursuant to Section 66 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 as at 12 March 2018 This protocol identifies cases and classes of cases which must always be considered for transfer to the High Court in accordance with section 66 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011. It is the obligation of the prosecution to identify cases falling within the protocol. The protocol has been...