Search Results

1. MacFarlane v Trustees of the K & T MacFarlane Whanau Trust [2014] Chief Judge’s MB 127 (2014 CJ 127) [pdf, 148 KB]

   IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20100012361 2014 Chief Judge's MB 127 2014 CJ 127 UNDER Section 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF K & T MacFarlane Whānau Trust and succession orders made at 181 Napier MB 148- 150 and at 181 Napier MB 151-152 dated 4 August 2005 BETWEEN Cara Verena MacFarlane Applicant AND Trustees of the K & T MacFarland Whanau Trust Respondent Judg...

2. Lee & Hwang v CAC 404 & Ors [2016] NZREADT 76 [pdf, 158 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 76 READT 031/15 UNDER THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS ACT 2008 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 111 OF THE ACT BETWEEN PHILIP LEE and HYUN SIM HWANG Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 404) First respondent AND HYUN (Mario) PARK, WON OK (Grace) OH Second respondents Hearing: Auckland, 25 October 2016 Tribunal: Ms KG Davenport QC, Chai...

3. Complaints Assessment Committee 409 v Andrew Rankin [2017] NZREADT 78 [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...imposed for similar conduct, in similar circumstances. The Tribunal should impose the least punitive penalty that is appropriate in the circumstances. While there is an element of punishment, rehabilitation is an important consideration.4 [11] Section 110(2) of the Act sets out the orders the Tribunal may make by way of penalty. As relevant to the present case the Tribunal may: 2 Section 3(1) of the Act. 3 Section 3(2) of the A...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 198 Ritchies Transport Holdings Limited v Merennage [pdf, 297 KB]

   RITCHIES TRANSPORT HOLDINGS LIMITED v KEERITHI MERENNAGE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 198 [13 November 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 198 EMPC 288/2014 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RITCHIES TRANSPORT HOLDINGS LIMITED Plaintiff AND KEERITHI MERENNAGE Defendant EMPC 287/2014 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the

5. River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors as Trustees of Ingodwe Trust v Olsson [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...distress is considered. Nature of proceedings [2] All of the parties filed witness statements. As each witness gave evidence they swore to the statements. Each witness was questioned first by the Tribunal and then by the parties pursuant to section 73 (1)(a) of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006. This decision is made pursuant to section 72 of the Act. All the evidence including 6 statements and documents that have been taken into account in making...

6. Deputy Registrar v Teki-Clark - Tauakira No 2M No 4 (2024) 495 Aotea MB 123 (495 AOT 123) [pdf, 472 KB]

   ...Registrar v Teki-Clark - Tauakira No. 2M No. 4 (2024) 495 Aotea MB 123 (495 AOT 123) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District AP-2024000001738 WĀHANGA Under Section 18(1)(a) Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Tauakira No. 2M No. 4 NĀ By DEPUTY REGISTRAR Te kaitono Applicant ME And ALAINA KOREENA TEKI-CLARK, BELINDA LEE BARTLETT, DANE...

7. Mhatre v Gokhale [2019] NZIACDT 10 (22 February 2019) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.5 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-200...

8. [2020] NZIACDT 26 - UO v Nukulasi (23 June 2020) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect the profession itself.6 5 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 6 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 5, at [151]. 6 [21] While protection of the public an...

9. INZ (Greathead) v Ortiz [2019] NZIACDT 69 (7 October 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...setting professional standards; (c) punishes the practitioner; (d) allows for the rehabilitation of the practitioner; 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auc...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 40 - NZQA (Seavor-Cross) v Jin (25 September 2020) [pdf, 190 KB]

    ...may have that effect, but to ensure that appropriate standards of conduct are maintained in the occupation concerned. 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 6 … The purpose of disciplinary proceedings is materially different to that of a criminal trial. It is to ascertain whether a practitioner has met appropriate standards of conduct in the occup...