Search Results

1. [2021] NZACDT 15 - YC v Han (29 June 2021) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect the collective reputation and public confidence in the profession itself.5 4 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 5 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) 492; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 4, at [151]. 6 [20] Wh...

2. [2022] NZIACDT 25 - CT v Nandan - Sanctions (3 October 2022) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...disciplinary proceedings is to protect the public who may come to a practitioner and to maintain the high standards and good reputation of an honourable profession. 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 6 [20] Professional conduct schemes, with their attached compliance regimes, exist to maintain high standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect the collecti...

3. [2023] NZIACDT 11 - SM v Kim (6 April 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect the collective reputation and public confidence in the profession itself.4 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 3, at [151]. 6 [20]...

4. [2022] NZIACDT 12 - LS v Murthy (27 May 2022) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...concerned and what may be required to ensure that, in the public interest, such standards are met in the future. The protection of the public is the central focus. 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 6 … Lord Diplock pointed out in Ziderman v General Dental Council that the purpose of disciplinary proceedings is to protect the public who may come to a practitioner and to maintain the high standards and goo...

5. [2024] NZIACDT 09 – ZR v Kim (4 March 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.5 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 and 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; and Z, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2...

6. [2025] NZIACDT 07 - INZ v Tran (22 January 2025) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.5 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 and 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; and Z, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2...

7. Gardiner v Gorringe (2011) 25 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 (25 WMN 83) [pdf, 293 KB]

   GARDINER V GORRINGE MLC 25 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 22 July 2011 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT 25 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 (25 WMN 83) A20070013172 UNDER Section 18(1)(c) and 18(1)(d) of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 BETWEEN PHILLIP GARDINER, WILLIAM GARDINER, DESMOND TATA, GEOFFREY ROLLESTON, EASTON TAIKATO, HINEWAI TAINGAHUE AND BRENDON TAINGAHUE AS TRUSTEES OF THE TAUWHAO TE NGARE TRUST Applicants AND PAUL GORR...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 95 Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd v Rottier [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...reasonable employer can be expected to comply with its own promulgated policies and procedures.6 Justification [65] The test of justification is described in s 103A of the Act. It states: 103A Test of justification (1) For the purposes of section 103(1)(a) and (b), the question of whether a dismissal or an action was justifiable must be determined, on an objective basis, by applying the test in subsection (2). (2) The test is whether the employer’s actions, and how the em...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 20 Henry v South Waikato Achievement Trust [pdf, 385 KB]

   ...[114] Under s 123(1)(b) of the Act the Court may order reimbursement of a sum equal to the whole or any part of the wages or other money lost by the employee as a result of the grievance. Where reimbursement for that loss is to be ordered, s 128(2) provides for it to be the lesser of a sum equal to the lost remuneration or three months’ ordinary time remuneration, but there is a discretion to award a greater amount. [115] The claim invites the Court to exercise the discretion un...

10. [2020] NZREADT 24 - Schroder (16 June 2020) [pdf, 163 KB]

    ...conduct that members of the public would not condone or find acceptable. Further, acceptance that such conduct is tolerable would tend to lower the standing and reputation of the real estate industry, and bring the industry into disrepute. [15] Section 73(c) of the Act provides that a licensee is guilty of misconduct if the licensee’s conduct: … (c) consists of a wilful or reckless contravention of– … (iii) regulations or rules made under this Act; … [16] Ms Davie...