Search Results

Search results for section 128.

2513 items matching your search terms

Search Employment Court only.

  1. [2021] NZIACDT 1 - HQT v Singh (15 January 2021) [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...disciplinary proceedings is to protect the public who may come to a practitioner and to maintain the high standards and good reputation of an honourable profession. 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 6 [20] Professional conduct schemes, with their attached compliance regimes, exist to maintain high standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to...

  2. [2022] NZIACDT 6 IL v Khetarpal (19 April 2022) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...facilitates the Tribunal’s important role in setting professional standards; (c) punishes the practitioner; (d) allows for the rehabilitation of the practitioner; 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Pate...

  3. [2021] NZIACDT 24 - HT v Shaikh – Sanctions (7 October 2021) [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...appropriately protects the public and deters others; (b) facilitates the Tribunal’s important role in setting professional standards; (c) punishes the practitioner; 5 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 6 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 5, at [151]. 7 Pa...

  4. [2023] NZIACDT 6 - NI v Chak (1 March 2023) [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...Professional conduct schemes, with their attached compliance regimes, exist to maintain high standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public 4 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 good, but also to protect the collective reputation and public confidence in the profession itself.5 [30] While protection of the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterre...

  5. [2025] NZIACDT 41 – KU v Wang (1 August 2025) [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...what may be required to ensure that, in the public interest, such standards are met in the future. The protection of the public is the central focus. … 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 6 Lord Diplock pointed out in Ziderman v General Dental Council that the purpose of disciplinary proceedings is to protect the public who may come to a practitioner and to maintain the high standards and good reputation of...

  6. [2022] NZACC 184 — Simpson v ACC (27 September 2022) [pdf, 233 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 184 ACR 70/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN ALBERT SIMPSON Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: B Hinchcliff for Mr Simpson L Mailand for the Respondent Judgment: 27 September...

  7. [2019] NZEnvC 173 Summerset Villages (St Johns) Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 9 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 173 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) of an appeal pursuant to s120 of the Act SUMMERSET VILLAGES (ST JOHNS) LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-160) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith Commissioner A Gysberts Commissioner K Prime Hearing: At Auckland, 9-11 September 2019 (including Site visit) Appearances: R E Bartlet

  8. Transcript - Hearing - PC7 - 8 to 26 March 2021 [updated] [pdf, 7.2 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju

  9. Transcript - Hearing - PC7 8 - 26 March [pdf, 7.2 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju

  10. [2022] NZACC 67 – KC v ACC (27 April 2022) [pdf, 209 KB]

    ...husband became angry and she “did not consent to the nature and quality of the intercourse”. [88] In terms of Schedule 3 of the Accident Compensation Act, these acts described by the appellant satisfy the definition of sexual violation (s 128(b)(1) of the Crimes Act) and necessarily the lessor offence of indecent assault. [89] Notwithstanding the sparse descriptions given by the appellant, they satisfy me on the balance of probabilities that she was a victim of sexual violatio...