Search Results

Search results for section 128.

2513 items matching your search terms

Search Employment Court only.

  1. [2020] NZIACDT 36 Y(O)R v Tian (7 August 2020) [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.5 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auc...

  2. Registrar of Immigration Advisers v Ho [2019] NZIACDT 63 (6 September 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 113 KB]

    ...who may come to a practitioner and to maintain the high standards and good reputation of an honourable profession. 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 6 [20] Professional conduct schemes, with their attached compliance regimes, exist to maintain high standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect...

  3. [2022] NZIACDT 4 - ZI v Wan Sanctions (3 March 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.5 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Compla...

  4. [2022] NZIACDT 30 - ZK v Li (19 December 2022) [pdf, 200 KB]

    ...disciplinary proceedings is to protect the public who may come to a practitioner and to maintain the high standards and good reputation of an honourable profession. 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 [25] Professional conduct schemes, with their attached compliance regimes, exist to maintain high standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect the collecti...

  5. [2023] NZREADT 29 CAC 1901 v KC (11 October 2023) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...Disciplinary Tribunal may make any award as to costs that it thinks fit, whether or not it grants any other remedy. (2) Without limiting the matters that the Disciplinary Tribunal may consider in determining whether to make an award of costs under this section, the Disciplinary Tribunal may take into account whether, and to what extent, any party to the proceedings— (a) has participated in good faith in the proceedings: (b) has facilitated or obstructed the process of information ga...

  6. [2024] NZIACDT 11 - UT v Lawlor (11 March 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

    ...Professional conduct schemes, with their attached compliance regimes, exist to maintain high standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 6 good, but also to protect the collective reputation and public confidence in the profession itself.4 [18] While protection of the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterrenc...

  7. [2025] NZIACDT 11 - INZ v Li (14 February 2025) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.6 4 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 5 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 and 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; and Z, above n 4, at [151]. 6 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2...

  8. [2025] NZIACDT 10 – INZ v Li (14 February 2025) [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.6 4 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 5 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 and 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; and Z, above n 4, at [151]. 6 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2...

  9. Summit v REAA & Lewis [2011] NZREADT 38 [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...However the Committee notes that Summit says their offer to go through the agreement with Mrs Lewis was not accepted. 3 The Committee’s view is that the management contract does not suffice as an agency agreement within the meaning of section 126(1)(a) or (b) of the Act. The agreement was not signed by the agent and the regulations in respect of an agency agreement require a statement about rebates, discounts and commissions that was not in the management contract. So whil...

  10. Environment Court annual report 2008 [pdf, 44 KB]

    ...Principal Environment Judge considered it appropriate to seek the appointment of an additional permanent Environment Judge. Approval to appoint an additional Environment Judge was received and that appointment process is underway. It is noted that section 250 of the RMA states that at any one time no more than 8 Environment Judges shall hold office; and any number of alternate Environment Judges shall hold office. The upcoming appointment will mean that the cap on permanent Environme...