Search Results

1. Complaints Assessment Committee 403 v Shalendra Goundar [2017] NZREADT 76 [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...imposed for similar conduct, in similar circumstances. The Tribunal should impose the least punitive penalty that is appropriate in the circumstances. While there is an element of punishment, rehabilitation is an important consideration.15 [16] Section 110(2) of the Act sets out the orders the Tribunal may make by way of penalty. As relevant to the present case the Tribunal may: 12 At paragraph [94]. 13 Section 3(1) of the Act....

2. Livingstone v Animal Health Board — Lake Rotoaira Forest Lands (2009) 245 Aotea MB 124 (245 AOT 124) [pdf, 133 KB]

   LIVINGSTONE V AHB MLC A20090013292 26 January 2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 245 AOTEA MB 124 A20090013292 UNDER Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Lake Rotoaira Forest Lands BETWEEN DAVID LIVINGSTONE Applicant AND ANIMAL HEALTH BOARD Respondent Hearing: 29 September 2009 (90 Taupo 100) (Heard at Whanganui) Appearances: Mr Livingstone in person Mr Alex Hope, counsel for Animal Health Bo...

3. CAC 414 v Goyal [2018] NZREADT 3 [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...accountability through a disciplinary process that is independent, transparent, and effective.6 2 Substantive decision, at paragraphs [28]–[34]. 3 At paragraphs [57]–[68]. 4 At paragraph [69]. 5 Section 3(1) of the Act. 6 Section 3(2). [14] These purposes are best met by penalties for misconduct and unsatisfactory conduct being determined bearing in mind the need to maintain a high standard of conduct in the industry, th...

4. [2021] NZIACDT 11 - YC v Han (19 May 2021) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...The sanctions that may be imposed by the Tribunal are set out in the Act.5 The focus of professional disciplinary proceedings is not punishment but the protection of the public.6 1 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 2 Section 49(3) & (4). 3 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128]...

5. Shihaku v Mizoguchi [2019] NZIACDT 24 (24 April 2019) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...the misconduct; (g) is the least restrictive penalty appropriate in the circumstances; and (h) looked at overall, is the penalty which is fair, reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances. 7 Section 49(3) & (4). 8 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 9 Section 50. 10 Section 51(1). 11 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128]...

6. [2020] NZIACDT 39 - IK v Tian (23 September 2020) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...After hearing a complaint, the Tribunal may dismiss it, uphold it but take no further action or uphold it and impose one or more sanctions.5 2 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 3 Section 49(3) & (4). 4 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 [26] The sanctions that may be imposed by the Tribunal are set out in the Act.6 The focus of prof...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 127 Taylor v Selwyn District Council [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...Cowlin dated 23 June 2019; (e) affidavit of J W Trevathan, dated 28 May 2019; (f) affidavit of N B Boyes, dated 29 May 2019; (g) joint memorandum dated 16 July 2019; (h) email from Regan Cowlin dated 15 July 2019. 3 Other relevant matters Section 274 parties [4] The following have given notice of an intention to become a party under s274 of the Resource Management Act ('the RMA') and have signed a memorandum1 agreeing to the amended proposal: (a) Marfell Family...

8. [2023] NZIACDT 14 - II v Sun (26 April 2023) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...complaint (10 October 2022), together with supporting documents. From the complainant [31] The Tribunal has received no submissions or communications from the complainant. 7 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 8 Section 49(3) & (4). 9 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 10 Section 50. 11 Section 51(1). 12 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [12...

9. [2022] NZIACDT 1 - ZI v Wan (19 January 2022) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...The sanctions that may be imposed by the Tribunal are set out in the Act.6 The focus of professional disciplinary proceedings is not punishment but the protection of the public.7 2 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 3 Section 49(3) & (4). 4 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128]...

10. [2024] NZIACDT 27 - INZ v Tran (20 November 2024) [pdf, 230 KB]

    ...with complaints referred to it.4 [27] After hearing a complaint, the Tribunal may dismiss it, uphold it but take no further action or uphold it and impose one or more sanctions.5 2 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) and (3). 3 Section 49(3) and (4). 4 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 50. 6 [28] The sanctions that may be imposed by the Tribunal are set out in th...