Search Results

1. [2022] NZIACDT 23 - TQ v Gibson - Sanctions (7 September 2022) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...disciplinary proceedings is to protect the public who may come to a practitioner and to maintain the high standards and good reputation of an honourable profession. 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 [24] Professional conduct schemes, with their attached compliance regimes, exist to maintain high standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect the collecti...

2. [2025] NZIACDT 12 - XI v Liu (18 February 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.5 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 and 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; and Z, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2...

3. [2025] NZIACDT 13 – HG v Liu (18 February 2025) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...appropriately protects the public and deters others; (b) facilitates the Tribunal’s important role in setting professional standards; (c) punishes the practitioner; 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 and 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; and Z, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Au...

4. [2024] NZEmpC 165 Berryman v Fonterra Coopertive Group Ltd - Interlocutory [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...claim relates to Fonterra’s treatment of unvaccinated workers and whether this constitutes unlawful discrimination. His second claim relates to s 36 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA) and whether Fonterra was required under this section to have its workforce vaccinated or tested for COVID-19, or required to take any other measures to keep others outside of its workplace safe. [24] In regard to Mr Berryman’s first claim of unlawful discrimination, the submissions...

5. [2024] NZIACDT 24 – FM v Yang (23 October 2024) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect the collective reputation and public confidence in the profession itself.4 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 and 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; and Z, above n 3, at [151]. 7 [25] While protection of the public and the pr...

6. [2025] NZIACDT 43 – BL v Schoeller (27 August 2025) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.5 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 and 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; and Z, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2...

7. Rudd v Hurunui – Horowhenua 11 Part Reservation [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 123 (2018 APPEAL 123) [pdf, 348 KB]

   2018 Māori Appellate Court MB 123 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20170005519 UNDER Section 58 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal by Charles Rudd pursuant to section 58 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 against a decision of the Māori Land Court made on 19 July 2017 at 372 Aotea MB 171-178 relating to HOROWHENUA 11 PART RESERVATION TRUST BETWEEN CHARLES RUDD Appellant AND THE TRUST...

8. [2023] NZIACDT 10 - NG v Murthy (15 March 2023) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...circumstances. Various support documents were enclosed with her letter. Immigration NZ refused the request on 5 November 2021. [7] On 24 December 2021, Ms Murthy lodged a second s 61 request. It was refused by Immigration NZ on 4 February 2022. 1 Section 61 of the Immigration Act 2009 permits the Minister of Immigration to grant a discretionary visa to those unlawfully in the country. 3 [8] There was a meeting between Ms Murthy and the complainant on 8 April 2022. T...

9. [2024] NZIACDT 03 – MT v Murthy (11 January 2024) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...The sanctions that may be imposed by the Tribunal are set out in the Act.7 The focus of professional disciplinary proceedings is not punishment but the protection of the public.8 3 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) and (3). 4 Section 49(3) and (4). 5 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009...

10. [2025] NZIACDT 05 – YI v Liu (14 January 2025) [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...gravity of the charges.7 From the Registrar [27] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint (27 February 2024) with a paginated bundle of documents. 1 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) and (3). 2 Section 49(3) and (4). 3 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009...