Search Results

1. INZ (Calder) v Horan [2019] NZIACDT 23 (23 April 2019) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect the profession itself.3 2 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 3 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [151]. 6 [18] While protection of the public and the profes...

2. KIT v Zhu [2019] NZIACDT 46 sanctions (8 July 2019) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.5 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auc...

3. [2020] NZIACDT 52 - TBE v Proudman (4 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...standards; (c) punishes the practitioner; (d) allows for the rehabilitation of the practitioner; (e) promotes consistency with penalties in similar cases; 4 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 5 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 4, at [151]. 6 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Aucklan...

4. HES v Parekh [2019] NZIACDT 47 sanctions (19 July 2019) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...the public interest, such standards are met in the future. The protection of the public is the central focus. … 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 7 Lord Diplock pointed out in Ziderman v General Dental Council that the purpose of disciplinary proceedings is to protect the public who may come to a practitioner and to maintain the high standards...

5. INZ (Calder) v Wong [2019] NZIACDT 55 (5 August 2019) sanctions [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...disciplinary proceedings are civil and not criminal in nature. That is because the purpose of statutory disciplinary 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 6 proceedings for various occupations is not to punish the practitioner for misbehaviour, although it may have that effect, but to ensure that appropriate standards of conduct are maintained in the...

6. [2021] NZIACDT 16 - EM v Yong (13 July 2021) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.6 4 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 5 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 4, at [151]. 6 Patel v Compla...

7. [2023] NZIACDT 7 - EQ v McCarthy (20 March 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...Professional conduct schemes, with their attached compliance regimes, exist to maintain high standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 good, but also to protect the collective reputation and public confidence in the profession itself.4 [23] While protection of the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterre...

8. [2024] NZIACDT 28 - EM v Ma (4 December 2024) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...the public and the profession is the focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.5 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 and 727; Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 (EWCA) at 492; and Z, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2...

9. [2025] NZIACDT 39 – CM v Jiang (31 July 2025) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...disciplinary proceedings is to protect the public who may come to a practitioner and to maintain the high standards and good reputation of an honourable profession. 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 7 [25] Professional conduct schemes, with their attached compliance regimes, exist to maintain high standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect the collective...

10. [2025] NZIACDT 40 – KM v Jiang (Sanctions) (31 July 2025) [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...disciplinary proceedings is to protect the public who may come to a practitioner and to maintain the high standards and good reputation of an honourable profession. 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 7 [25] Professional conduct schemes, with their attached compliance regimes, exist to maintain high standards of propriety and professional conduct not just for the public good, but also to protect the collective...