Search Results

1. Malcolm v Hahipene - Te Karaka 1B2B1 (2024) 318 Waiariki MB 24 (318 WAR 24) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...Te Karaka 1B2B1 (2024) 318 Waiariki MB 24 (318 WAR 24) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District AP-20230000034284 AP-20230000034289 WĀHANGA Under Sections 18(1)(a) and 151, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Te Karaka 1B2B1 I WAENGA I A Between GRACE RIRIA MALCOLM AND ANGELA RITOHAU MALCOLM Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And...

2. People charged and convicted of sexual offences December 2019 [xlsx, 515 KB]

   Contents Sexual offences Sexual offences are any offence within ANZSOC division 03: Sexual assault and related offences. These offences are then categorised, where possible, by the age and/or gender of the victim included in the offence description (victim type), or by the legislative reference of the offence (offence type). Contents: Charges Table 1a: Number and percentage of charges for sexual offences, by victim type and charge outcome, 2010 - 2019 Table 1b: Number and percen

3. [2023] NZEnvC 001 Swap Stockfoods Limited v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   ...with Ngāi Te Rangi, Toi Te Ora, affected industries and other affected parties to ensure iterative management proceeds to ensure the objectives of Plan Change 13 are achieved as effectively and efficiently as practicable. 4 Contents Section A Introduction A1 Dust in the Mount Maunganui Airshed ...................................................... 9 A2 The Mount Maunganui Airshed ................................................................. 13 A3 Proposed Plan C...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 134 Hungry Hound Ltd v Hayes [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...casual 4 Presumably so as to comply with s 28 of the Holidays Act 2003, however, because Danica and Shani had not agreed to this in an employment agreement, there was not compliance with that section. agreement was until such time as terminated by either party pursuant to the termination clause in the agreement; there was no provision in the agreement for either party to terminate the agreement, except where there was s...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 171 Fifita v Dunedin Casinos Ltd [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...dismissal. [8] On this basis, the Authority found that the defendant had failed to comply with paragraphs (b) to (d) of s 103A of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act), which provides: 103A Test of justification (1) For the purposes of section 103(1)(a) and (b), the question of whether a dismissal or an action was justifiable must be determined, on an objective basis, by applying the test in subsection (2). (2) The test is whether the employer's actions, and how the e...

6. CAC 413 v Marr [2019] NZREADT 28 - Penalty (1 July 2019) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...imposed for similar conduct, in similar circumstances. The Tribunal should impose the least punitive penalty that is appropriate in the circumstances. While there is an element of punishment, rehabilitation is an important consideration.8 [16] Section 110(2) of the Act sets out the orders the Tribunal may make by way of penalty. As relevant to the present case the Tribunal may: [a] Make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may impose under s 93 of the Act (th...

7. INZ (Foley) v Rodriguez [2019] NZIACDT 51 (23 July 2019) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Welder is metal fabricator so we still call you welder here. [19] In the work visa application, dated 28 September 2016, lodged on behalf of Mr B by Ms Rodriguez, she described the position as welder (ANZSCO code 322313). In the work history section, only one employer was identified where he had spent more than four years as an “Aluminium fabricator/installer (technician)”. [20] On 7 October 2016, Mr B again reiterated that the job title was welder, but he was really an alum...

8. KBN v Wharekura [2019] NZIACDT 80 (9 December 2019) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...complainant he had contacted the Dyslexia Association and was waiting for a letter from it. [7] The complainant paid Mr Wharekura $400 on 27 November 2018. [8] Mr Wharekura wrote a document, dated 27 November 2018, which was addressed to the “Section 61 Team”. It introduced the complainant and explained his 1 KBN v Wharekura [2019] NZIACDT 66. 3 circumstances, including his dyslexia. An exemption from the IELTS residence re...

9. [2020] NZIACDT 25 - RV v Aiolupotea (12 June 2020) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due care and in a timely manner. Written agreements 19. A licensed immigration adviser must ensure that a written agreement contains: 3 Section 49(3) & (4). 4 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128...

10. [2021] NZREADT 46 - Tapu (23 August 2021) [pdf, 270 KB]

    ...imposed for similar conduct, in similar circumstances. The Tribunal should impose the least punitive penalty that is appropriate in the circumstances. While there is an element of punishment, rehabilitation is an important consideration.12 [12] Section 110(2) of the Act sets out the orders the Tribunal may make by way of penalty. As may be relevant to the present case, the Tribunal may: [a] make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may make under s 93 of the...