Search Results

1. Far North District Council v Maihi - Okahu 3B2B2 (2014) 91 Taitokerau MB 284 (91 TTK 284) [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   91 Taitokerau MB 284 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20120014247 UNDER Section 183, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okahu 3B2B2 Block BETWEEN FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant A20140010697 UNDER Section 215, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okahu 1, 3B2B2A, 3B2B2C, 3B2B2D, 4A, 4B, 4D, 4C1, 4C2, 3A and 3B2A Blocks BETWEEN TE URI REIHANA-NGATOTE and DES...

2. Complaints Assessment Committee 416 v Singh [2018] NZREADT 34 [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...properly secured the approval of the vendor to market the 6 See Complaints Assessment Committee 10056 v Ferguson [2013] NZREADT 30, Morton- Jones v The Real Estate Agents Authority [2016] NZHC 1804, at [128] and Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1, at [97]. 7 Picknell, fn 2, above, at paragraph [15](ii). property.”8 The Tribunal considered that an order for censure was not called for, but...

3. Singh v Golian [2019] NZIACDT 9 (19 February 2019) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...setting professional standards; (c) punishes the practitioner; (d) allows for the rehabilitation of the practitioner; 2 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 3 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [151]. 4 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-200...

4. INZ (Foley) v Niland [2019] NZIACDT 16 (19 March 2019) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.4 2 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 3 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [151]. 4 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-200...

5. Immigration New Zealand (Carley) v De'Ath [2019] NZIACDT 1 (10 Jan 2019) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...Code in respect of the 11 visa applicants represented by Mr De’Ath all arose out of one fundamental mistake. He 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725, 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [151]. 5 Patel v The Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2007-404-...

6. General Consent Memorandum Relating to Children [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...below  The details of how you have reached your agreement (such as privately, through a lawyer or court event etc).  All details of any legal advice received by the parties, or if not, the reasons why no legal advice was sought. [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [1...

7. DJ v Dua [2019] NZIACDT 22 (18 April 2019) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...may have that effect, but to ensure that appropriate standards of conduct are maintained in the occupation concerned. 2 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 8 … The purpose of disciplinary proceedings is materially different to that of a criminal trial. It is to ascertain whether a practitioner has met appropriate standards of conduct in the occup...

8. [2020] NZIACDT 29 - Immigration New Zealand (Carley) v Penty (6 July 2020) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.6 4 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 5 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 4, at [151]. 6 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auc...

9. INZ (Gilray) v Croxson [2019] NZIACDT 79 (9 December 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...may have that effect, but to ensure that appropriate standards of conduct are maintained in the occupation concerned. 4 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 7 … The purpose of disciplinary proceedings is materially different to that of a criminal trial. It is to ascertain whether a practitioner has met appropriate standards of conduct in the occup...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 16 - NL v Joseph - Sanctions (12 March 2020) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...focus, the issues of punishment and deterrence must also be taken into account in selecting the appropriate penalty.5 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citations omitted). 4 Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) at 724–725 & 727; Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 3, at [151]. 5 Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auc...