Search Results

1. Bacic v Tulip Holdings Limited (in liq) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...repairs to unit 3 as recorded in WHRS claim no. 692, was $140,125.91 and the costs for 1/9 unit in the neighbouring block, as recorded in WHRS claim no. 499, was $191,360.44. Page 9 [22] In March 2004, the Council issued a notice under section 42 of the Building Act 1991 to rectify the building work. In June 2005, the Council requested access to the unit in order to carry out an invasive report. Richard Maiden of Prendos was engaged by the Council to do that work. A co...

2. [2020] NZIACDT 17 - XA v Hill (10 March 2020) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...proceedings. However, the quality of the evidence required to meet that standard may differ in cogency, depending on the gravity of the charges.8 2 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 3 Section 49(3) & (4). 4 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97]...

3. Taueki - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Māori Reservation (2005) 163 Aotea MB 99 (163 AOT 99) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   Minute Book: 163 AOT 99 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NE"\x/ ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Hearing: Counsel: Judgment: Introduction A20030002310 UNDER Sections 67, 19, 231 & 240, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Maori Rerservation­ Judicial Conference, Interlocutory Injunction, Review of Trust & Removal of Trustees VIVIENNE T AUEKI Applicant 10 October, 17 March 2005 29 October, 17 September 2004 4 December, 17 September, 4 June,

4. [2024] NZEnvC 022 WST Company (2016) Limited [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   WST COMPANY (2016) LIMITED v AUCKLAND COUNCIL Decision [2024] NZEnvC 022 [28 February 2024] IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 022 IN THE MATTER OF a directly referred application for resource consent for an equestrian centre at 4 James Mackie Road, Wharepapa BETWEEN WST COMPANY (2016) LIMITED (ENV-2020-AKL-000181) Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority Court: Environ

5. [2021] NZEmpC 59 Humphrey v Canterbury District Health Board [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...relationship, 1 Humphrey v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Health [2021] NZERA 43 (Member Cheyne). 2 Reid v New Zealand Fire Service Commission [1998] 2 ERNZ 250 at 280 (EC); Reid v New Zealand Fire Service Commission [1999] 1 ERNZ 104 (CA). 3 Section 127(4). 4 Section 3. the obligations both parties have to be responsive and communicative, and that issues ought to be dealt with promptly and between the parties if possible - in other words, supporting constructive...

6. KXBK v GVH [2019] NZIACDT 74 (1 November 2019) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...does not accept that he has breached any professional obligations. The adviser sent further information to the Tribunal on 20 April 2018. 5 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 6 Section 49(3) & (4). 7 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 8 Section 50. 9 Section 51(1). 10 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [1...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 106 Kiteley v Carbine Aginvest Corp Ltd [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...might reasonably have been expected to obtain if a personal grievance had not arisen. He also claims reimbursement of salary lost as a result of the grievance. Mr Oldfield also presented an argument as to the correct interpretation to be given to s 128 of the Act which deals with the quantum of such reimbursement. However, in view of my findings in this judgment, I now do not need to consider further the submissions relating to remedies. [34] In reply, Mr France, counsel for the...

8. TSO v Essina [2020] NZIACDT 2 (16 January 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...Legislative requirements 3. A licensed immigration adviser must: … c. whether in New Zealand or offshore, act in accordance with New Zealand immigration legislation, including the Immigration Act 2 Section 49(3) & (4). 3 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128]...

9. NLT v Coetzee [2019] NZIACDT 81 (10 December 2019) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...as an independent contractor and obtain residence in due course. At the request of the Tribunal, Mr Moses made further submissions on 5 December 2019. [55] No party has requested an oral hearing. 4 Section 49(3) & (4). 5 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Section 50. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128]...

10. [2022] NZREADT 26 He & An (22 November 2022) [pdf, 253 KB]

    ...Mr He to obtain the vendor’s consent in the prescribed form and to provide the vendor with a valuation pursuant to ss 134 and 135 of the Act. [46] The Committee found Mr He guilty of unsatisfactory conduct by failing to comply with the above sections of the Act. It considered that Mr He “did not appear to understand his obligations in terms of the Act under which licensees operate” and that the breach was “at the upper level on the scale of seriousness”. The Committee wa...