281 items matching your search terms
BREAD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN AUCKLAND v XI (ROBERT) CHEN [2025] NZEmpC 69 [4 April 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 69 EMPC 141/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BREAD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN AUCKLAND Plaintiff AND XI (ROBERT) CHEN Defendant EMPC 181/2024 IN T
...reviews (this was abandoned at the hearing upon concession as to limitation); d) breach of Principle 11 of the Privacy Act 1993 by disclosing the plaintiff’s personal information to the media; and e) breach of the obligation of good faith. (Section 4(A)(b)(iii) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) is relied upon as setting the obligation when it should be s 4 (1)(a)). [9] The remedies sought are: a) permanent reinstatement; b) reimbursement for past earnings,...
TOTAL PROPERTY SERVICES (CANTERBURY) LIMITED v CREST COMMERCIAL CLEANING LIMITED [2023] NZEmpC 237 [22 December 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2023] NZEmpC 237 EMPC 361/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN TOTAL PROPERTY SERVICES (CANTERBURY) LIMITED Plaintiff AND CREST COMMERCIAL CLEANING LIMITED
THE 20 DISTRICT HEALTH BOARDS (listed in Appendix A) v NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION [2021] NZEmpC 138 [23 August 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 138 EMPC 266/2021 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed in full from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN THE 20 DISTRICT HEALTH BOARDS (listed in Appendix A) Plaintiffs AND NEW ZEALAND NUR
SIOUXSIE WILES v THE VICE-CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND [2024] NZEmpC 123 [8 July 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 123 EMPC 477/2021 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SIOUXSIE WILES Plaintiff AND THE VICE-CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND Defendant Hearing: 6-24, 28
...to follow a robust process. [28] A close review of the evidence reflects a mismatch of understandings as to the key concern from Mr Roberts’ perspective. Mr Maddigan was focussed on the two 2 Section 103A. 3 Section 103A(5). speeding tickets and the suspension of his licence; he evidently believed that once that issue had been resolved by the Court process, Mr Roberts’ concerns would largely fall away. All of that shou...
...making its proposal to the Authority. [41] A non de novo challenge arises from an election made pursuant to s 179 of the Act. A party dissatisfied with the written determination of the Authority may elect to have the matter heard by the Court. Section 179(3) provides that the election must: 179 Challenges to determinations of Authority … (a) specify the determination, or the part of the determination, to which the election relates; and (b) state whether or not the par...
...Thereafter, ACC carried the primary responsibility for providing for support of DSO by CSN. [8] There are two issues which now fall for determination by the Court: (a) Was CSN a care and support worker under the Vaccinations Order? 1 Section 4 and sch 2. (b) Did the employment relationship between the parties continue from 23 November 2021 to 27 April 2022? The framework for the work performed by CSN [9] DSO has cover under the Accident Compensation Act 2001 as...
...Court is limited. The following arguments advanced by the plaintiff do, however, fall legitimately within those confines. [35] Next, counsel submitted that the Court’s finding of bad faith under s 4 did not only constitute a breach of that section. The company’s case is that, additionally, bad faith disqualified the drivers from earning wages because of their activities and intentions on 1 August 2007. 14 To swindle, cheat,...
...Leave On the death of an employee the Director General may approve a cash grant in lieu of retiring leave to: • The surviving partner; or • Dependent children; or the estate of a deceased employee. … [10] In the definitions section of the CEA, the following statement was made: For Leave Purposes: Day: Means number of hours an employee normally works each day. … [11] Appendix 2 to the CEA was a document dated 3 May 2013, described as terms of settlem...