281 items matching your search terms
REEGAN PAORA LAWTON v STEEL PENCIL HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) [2021] NZEmpC 199 [18 November 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 199 EMPC 78/2021 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN REEGAN PAORA LAWTON Plaintiff AND STEEL PENCIL HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) First Defendant AN
NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC v AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 7 [11 February 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 7 EMPC 152/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for compliance orders BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC First Plaintiff AND THE PERSONS LISTED IN SCHEDULE A Second Plaintiffs AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant
JAMES SMALLEY v HAMILTON HINDIN GREENE LIMITED [2024] NZEmpC 195 [9 October 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2024] NZEmpC 195 EMPC 188/2024 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for an order that the Employment Relations Authority investigate the matter which is before the Employment Court B
IONA WIKAIRA v THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 175 [20 December 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 175 EMPC 13/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN IONA WIKAIRA Plaintiff AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Defendant Hearing: 15 August 2016 (at Auckland), 23 and 24 August 2016 (at
...considered. While the power to make an order for interim reinstatement is a discretionary one, the assessment of whether there is a serious question to be tried is not. It requires judicial evaluation. 2 Employment Relations Act 2000, s 127(4). 3 Section 3. 4 Humphrey v Canterbury District Health Board [2021] NZEmpC 59, [2021] ERNZ 153 at [6]-[9], citing NZ Tax Refunds Ltd v Brooks Homes Ltd [2013] NZCA 90, (2013) 13 TCLR 531 at [12]- [13]. [6] In a claim for inter...
Q v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 [7 May 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 CRC 8/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN Q Plaintiff AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: (26-30 January, 2-5 and 12-13 February 2015) (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: A Shaw, J Behrnes and M Dutkiewicz, co
...NZEmpC 54, [2020] ERNZ 136. 13 Employment Court Regulations 2000, regs 37−52. [96] In the present case, the Authority correctly stated that the provision of relevant documents in the Authority is governed by s 160 of the Act.14 [97] That section relevantly provides: 160 Powers of Authority (1) The Authority may, in investigating any matter,— (a) call for evidence and information from the parties or from any other person: (b) require the parties or any other person...
...January 2010. [46] There are two problems with Ms Sharma’s submissions. The first problem is the Limitation Act 1950, and the Limitation Act 2010, are irrelevant. The defendants relied on the limitation created by s 142 of the Act. The section reads: 142 Limitation period for actions other than personal grievances No action may be commenced in the Authority or the court in relation to an employment relationship problem that is not a personal grievance more than 6 year...
...to be influential.34 [43] The Authority considered a question raised by Mr Boyd as to whether there was a claim from him for damages before it. It noted that there was no “counterclaim 30 At [27]. 31 At [31]. 32 At [34]. 33 At [35]. Section 116 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 applies where there are allegations of sexual harassment; no account may be taken of the complainant’s sexual experience or reputation. 34 At [37]. for damages” at the time of the s...
JASON MCCOOK v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE INLAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT [2020] NZEmpC 109 [27 July 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2020] NZEmpC 109 EMPC 254/2019 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a declaration pursuant to s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to objection as to disclosure AND IN THE MATTER of an applic