281 items matching your search terms
NEW ZEALAND PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION TE PUKENGA HERE TIKANGA MAHI v COMMISSIONER AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE INLAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT TE TARI TAAKE NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 164 [21 December 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 164 EMPC 348/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION TE PUKENGA HERE TIKANGA MAHI Plaintiff AND
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE v NEW ZEALAND POLICE ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED [2021] NZEmpC 8 [11 February 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 8 EMPC 339/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED Defendant
BIRTHING CENTRE LIMITED v REBEKAH MATSAS [2023] NZEmpC 162 [27 September 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZEmpC 162 EMPC 285/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BIRTHING CENTRE LIMITED Plaintiff AND REBEKAH MATSAS First Defendant AND CHELSEA VAN DUIN Second Defendant AND
...[3] If I find that this was a constructive dismissal, whether it was justifiable must be determined in accordance with s103A of the Employment Relations Act 2000 which provides: 103A Test of justification For the purposes of section 103(1)(a) and (b), the question of whether a dismissal or an action was justifiable must be determined, on an objective basis, by considering whether the employer's actions, and how the employer acted, were what a fair and reasonabl...
MARY KATHLEEN SCHOLLUM v CORPORATE CONSUMABLES LIMITED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 115 [27 September 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 115 EMPC 204/2016 IN THE MATTER OF A referral of a question of law from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MARY KATHLEEN SCHOLLUM First Plaintiff AND JONATHAN WAYNE HASTINGS Second Plaintiff AND CORPORATE CONSUMABLES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27 - 30 Ma
VICE-CHANCELLOR OF MASSEY UNIVERSITY V MARTIN WRIGLEY NZEmpC 37 18 April 2011 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2011] NZEmpC 37 WRC 2/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VICE-CHANCELLOR OF MASSEY UNIVERSITY Plaintiff AND MARTIN WRIGLEY First Defendant AND TERRY KELLY Second Defendant Hearing: 13 May 2010 (Heard at Wellington) Court: Chief Judge G L Colgan Judge B S Tra
DEREK GIBSON-SMITH v MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT [2020] NZEmpC 62 [11 May 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2020] NZEmpC 62 EMPC 196/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DEREK GIBSON-SMITH Plaintiff AND MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT Defendant H
JEAN LOIS COWAN v IDEA SERVICES LIMITED [2019] NZEmpC 172 [25 November 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2019] NZEmpC 172 EMPC 9/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JEAN LOIS COWAN Plaintiff AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 16 and 17 September 2019 (Heard at Palmers
IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 119 CRC 16/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN PACT GROUP (A CHARITABLE TRUST) Plaintiff AND SERVICE AND FOOD WORKERS UNION NGA RINGA TOTA INC First Defendant AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION TE PUKENGA HERE TIKANGA MAHI INCORPORATED Second Defendant Hearing: 16 and 17 June 2014 (Heard at Dunedi
...on an interim basis until now. [127] Mr Williams noted that Mr D is 62 years of age. He holds, and has held, a number of low wage jobs. He is currently employed in seasonal work, although he aims to seek stable and better paid employment. [128] QDA neither consents to, nor opposes, the making of a permanent order. [129] Whilst no clear diagnosis exists, it is clear there are a number of interpersonal issues as already discussed. In a report obtained after the cessation of Mr D...