[2023] NZEmpC 50 Pilgrim v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 32) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 4 April 2023) APPLICATION TO ACCESS COURT DOCUMENT – applicant is a media outlet – documents sought will support informed, fair and balanced reporting – consent by other parties – application granted.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3640 items matching your search terms
-
[2023] NZEmpC 50 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [PDF, 173 KB] -
[2023] NZEmpC 49 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [PDF, 174 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 49 Pilgrim v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 31) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 4 April 2023) APPLICATION TO ACCESS COURT DOCUMENT – parties consent – application granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 48 Bird v Vice-Chancellor of the University of Waikato [PDF, 172 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 48 Bird v Vice-Chancellor of the University of Waikato (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 29 March 2023) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs awarded – no basis for awarding costs on costs.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 47 Farrand Orchards Ltd v Tane [PDF, 251 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 47 Farrand Orchards Ltd v Tane (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 29 March 2023) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR REHEARING – APPLICATION FOR REHEARING – new evidence could have been found at original hearing with reasonable diligence – proposed new evidence is unlikely to assist the court – no ground for rehearing.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 46 MW v Spiga Ltd [PDF, 167 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 46 MW v Spiga Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 28 March 2023) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – informal non-publication orders had been made in the Authority – sound reasons exist for non-publication order – application granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 45 Wiles v The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland [PDF, 281 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 45 Wiles v The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge J C Holden, 20 March 2023) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS – application partially granted - APPLICATIONS FOR NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS – personal information of other staff members should be kept confidential – interim non-publication orders made regarding safety report and implementation plan – no basis for non-publication orders in regard to other matters - APPLICATION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE – expert evidence should not be legal submissions – lack of independence goes to weight given to the evidence – application partially granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 44 Maheta v Skybus New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 145 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 44 Maheta v Skybus New Zealand Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 17 March 2023) APPLICATION FOR STAY - consent.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 43 Butt v Attorney-General [PDF, 174 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 43 Butt v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 17 March 2023) APPLICATION FOR STAY – pending matter in the Court of Appeal has common questions of fact and law that are likely to be determinative – application granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 42 Chen v WNY Group Ltd [PDF, 166 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 42 Chen v WNY Group Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 16 March 2023) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 40 Straayer v Employment Relations Authority [PDF, 180 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 40 Straayer v Employment Relations Authority (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 15 March 2023) APPLICATION FOR STAY – appeal has not been filed – no basis for a stay – application declined.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 38 Halse v Employment Relations Authority [PDF, 151 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 38 Halse v Employment Relations Authority (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 15 March 2023) APPLICATION FOR A STAY PENDING JUDICIAL REVIEW – nothing to stay – application declined.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 39 Wilson-Grange Investments v Guerra [PDF, 226 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 39 Wilson-Grange Investments v Guerra (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 14 March 2023) NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGE - PERSONAL GRIEVANCE - Authority did not make an error in finding reduction in wages to be personal grievance, even in circumstances of COVID-19 lockdown - Authority did not make an error in finding a personal grievance for an unfair disciplinary process or in awarding costs.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 41 Fitzherbert Regency Motor Lodge (2018) Ltd v Smith [PDF, 96 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 41 Fitzherbert Regency Motor Lodge (2018) Ltd v Smith (Consent Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 13 March 2023) CONSENT.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 37 Elliott v Coastal Cabins Ltd [PDF, 125 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 37 Elliott v Coastal Cabins Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 9 March 2023) CONSENT.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 36 Hilford v Board of Trustees of Whangarei Boys’ High School [PDF, 253 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 36 Hilford v Board of Trustees of Whangarei Boys’ High School (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 8 March 2023) EVIDENCE – CHALLENGE - whether Authority appropriately ordered documents to be destroyed – determination could be challenged because order had a substantive effect – destruction of documents went too far – documents to be kept in redacted form.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 35 New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc v Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand [PDF, 249 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 35 New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc v Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Judge B A Corkill, 8 March 2023) APPLICATION WITH REGARD TO INTERVENER STATUS – issues are important – intervener participation allowed on a restricted basis.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 34 Henry v South Waikato Achievement Trust [PDF, 142 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 34 Henry v South Waikato Achievement Trust (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 7 March 2023) COSTS - CONSENT.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 33 Pyne v Invacare New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 239 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 33 Pyne v Invacare New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 7 March 2023) NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGE - NATURE AND EXTENT OF HEARING - non-de novo challenge is not a stricto sensu appeal - evidence presented in Court is not restricted to evidence that was presented in Authority.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 32 A Labour Inspector v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [PDF, 141 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 32 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre (Consent Costs Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 1 March 2023) COSTS - CONSENT.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 31 Pact Group v Robinson [PDF, 170 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 31 Pact Group v Robinson (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 1 March 2023) APPLICATION TO PARTICIPATE AT A HEARING BY ALTERNATIVE MEANS – application not opposed – witness lives in Australia and travel would present personal difficulties – application granted.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 30 Goldie v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [PDF, 219 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 30 Goldie v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 28 February 2023) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – RAISING THE GRIEVANCE – advocate unreasonably failed to raise grievance on applicant’s behalf – failure was exceptional circumstance under s 115(b) – s 114(4)(a) would apply even if failure by advocate was not “unreasonable” – leave granted to raise grievance out of time.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 29 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand [PDF, 202 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 29 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Judge J C Holden, 28 February 2023) APPLICAION TO DISMISS PROCEEDINGS – Authority can determine how it investigates an employment relationship, including what evidence to accept –Authority determination on evidence admissibility cannot be challenged under s 179(5) – proceedings dismissed – non-publication orders made.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 28 Oliver v Biggs [PDF, 187 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 28 Oliver v Biggs (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 28 February 2023) APPLICATION FOR COMPLIANCE ORDER – previous Costs awards have not been paid – no explanation made for ignoring Court orders – fine of $3,000 imposed – compliance orders made.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 27 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [PDF, 179 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 27 Pilgrim v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 30) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 27 February 2023) APPLICATION FOR DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS – documents sought are relevant – disclosure would be time-consuming and expensive – application granted with conditions.
-
[2023] NZEmpC 26 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [PDF, 169 KB] [2023] NZEmpC 26 Pilgrim v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 29) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 25 February 2023) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO RECALL A WITNESS FOR CROSS-EXAMINATION – evidence is relevant – recall can be accommodated pragmatically – application granted.